NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
The long and the short of it: unlocking nanopore long-read RNA sequencing data with short-read tools
Xueyi DongiD, Luyi TianiD, Quentin A. GouiliD, Hasaru Kariyawasam, Shian SuiD, Ricardo De Paoli‐IseppiiD, Yair D. J. PraweriD, Michael B. ClarkiD, Kelsey A. BresliniD, Megan IminitoffiD, Marnie E. BlewittiD, Charity W. LawiD, Matthew E. RitchieiD
Abstract
Application of Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read sequencing platform to transcriptomic analysis is increasing in popularity. However, such analysis can be challenging due to small library sizes and high sequence error, which decreases quantification accuracy and reduces power for statistical testing. Here, we report the analysis of two nanopore sequencing RNA-seq datasets with the goal of obtaining gene-level and isoform-level differential expression information. A dataset of synthetic, spliced, spike-in RNAs ("sequins") as well as a mouse neural stem cell dataset from samples with a null mutation of the epigenetic regulator Smchd1 were analysed using a mix of long-read specific tools for preprocessing together with established short-read RNA-seq methods. We used limma-voom to perform differential gene expression analysis, and the novel FLAMES pipeline to perform isoform identification and quantification, followed by DRIMSeq and limma-diffSplice (with stageR) to perform differential transcript usage analysis. We compared results from the sequins dataset to the ground truth, and results of the mouse dataset to a previous short-read study on equivalent samples. Overall, our work shows that transcriptomic analysis of long-read nanopore data using short-read software and methods that are already in wide use can yield meaningful results.
- organism: mouse
- assay: long-read sequencing
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 48
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transcriptome profiling of mouse samples using nanopore sequencing of cDNA and RNA molecules
Camille Sessegolo, Corinne Cruaud, … Jean‐Marc Aury·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2019
- To make a short story long: simultaneous short and long RNA profiling on Nanopore devices
Morgan E. Mackenzie, Susan L. Tigert, … Christos Argyropoulos·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2022
- Assembly Arena: Benchmarking RNA isoform reconstruction algorithms for nanopore sequencing
Mélanie Sagniez, Anshul Budhraja, … Martin A. Smith·bioRxiv·Mar 21, 2024
- Quantitative Full-length transcriptome analysis by nanopore sequencing with Error-Aware UMI mapping
Qingwen Li, Dongxu Li, … Jizhong Lou·Biophysics ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Parallel and scalable workflow for the analysis of Oxford Nanopore direct RNA sequencing datasets
Luca Cozzuto, Huanle Liu, … Eva Maria Novoa·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2020
- Systematic evaluation of transcript normalization methods and quantification pipelines across long-read sequencing platforms
Alejandro Paniagua, Fabian Jetzinger, … Ana Conesa·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2026