Transcriptome profiling of mouse samples using nanopore sequencing of cDNA and RNA molecules
Camille SessegoloiD, Corinne CruaudiD, Corinne Da SilvaiD, Audric CologneiD, Marion DubarryiD, Thomas DerrieniD, Vincent LacroixiD, Jean‐Marc AuryiD
Abstract
Our vision of DNA transcription and splicing has changed dramatically with the introduction of short-read sequencing. These high-throughput sequencing technologies promised to unravel the complexity of any transcriptome. Generally gene expression levels are well-captured using these technologies, but there are still remaining caveats due to the limited read length and the fact that RNA molecules had to be reverse transcribed before sequencing. Oxford Nanopore Technologies has recently launched a portable sequencer which offers the possibility of sequencing long reads and most importantly RNA molecules. Here we generated a full mouse transcriptome from brain and liver using the Oxford Nanopore device. As a comparison, we sequenced RNA (RNA-Seq) and cDNA (cDNA-Seq) molecules using both long and short reads technologies and tested the TeloPrime preparation kit, dedicated to the enrichment of full-length transcripts. Using spike-in data, we confirmed that expression levels are efficiently captured by cDNA-Seq using short reads. More importantly, Oxford Nanopore RNA-Seq tends to be more efficient, while cDNA-Seq appears to be more biased. We further show that the cDNA library preparation of the Nanopore protocol induces read truncation for transcripts containing internal runs of Ts. This bias is marked for runs of at least 15 Ts, but is already detectable for runs of at least 9 Ts and therefore concerns more than 20% of expressed transcripts in mouse brain and liver. Finally, we outline that bioinformatics challenges remain ahead for quantifying at the transcript level, especially when reads are not full-length. Accurate quantification of repeat-associated genes such as processed pseudogenes also remains difficult, and we show that current mapping protocols which map reads to the genome largely over-estimate their expression, at the expense of their parent gene. The entire dataset is available from http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/externe/ONT_mouse_RNA.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 108
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Improved Nanopore full-length cDNA sequencing by PCR-suppression
Anthony Bayega, Spyros Oikonomopoulos, … Jiannis Ragoussis·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2022
- The long and the short of it: unlocking nanopore long-read RNA sequencing data with short-read tools
Xueyi Dong, Luyi Tian, … Matthew E. Ritchie·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 9, 2021
- A comprehensive examination of Nanopore native RNA sequencing for characterization of complex transcriptomes
Charlotte Soneson, Yao Yao, … Shobbir Hussain·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 31, 2019
- Nanopore native RNA sequencing of a human poly(A) transcriptome
Rachael E. Workman, Alison D. Tang, … Winston Timp·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2019
- Quantitative Full-length transcriptome analysis by nanopore sequencing with Error-Aware UMI mapping
Qingwen Li, Dongxu Li, … Jizhong Lou·Biophysics ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Distinct 5' and 3' Coverage Biases Shape Transcriptome Interpretation in Nanopore Direct RNA versus PCR-cDNA Sequencing
Rebecca E. Lane, Eleanor Calcutt, … Adam P. Cribbs·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2026