Sign in
ZoologyPLoS ONE
Peer-reviewed journal article

Eye features and retinal photoreceptors of the nocturnal aardvark (Orycteropus afer, Tubulidentata)

Leo PeichliD, Sonja Meimann, Irina V. SoloveiiD, Irene Luise GügeliD, Christina GeigeriD, Nicole Schauerte, Karolina Goździewska‐HarłajczukiD, Joanna Klećkowska‐NawrotiD, Gudrun WibbeltiD, Silke HaverkampiD

Abstract

The nocturnal aardvark Orycteropus afer is the only extant species in the mammalian order Tubulidentata. Previous studies have claimed that it has an all-rod retina. In the retina of one aardvark, we found rod densities ranging from 124,000/mm2 in peripheral retina to 214,000/mm2 in central retina; the retina of another aardvark had 182,000 - 245,000 rods/mm2. This is moderate in comparison to other nocturnal mammals. With opsin immunolabelling we found that the aardvark also has a small population of cone photoreceptors. Cone densities ranged from 300 to 1,300/mm2 in one animal, and from 1,100 to 1,600/mm2 in the other animal, with large local variations and no large central-peripheral density gradient. Overall, cones comprised 0.25-0.9% of the photoreceptors. Both typical mammalian cone opsins, longwave-sensitive (L) and shortwave-sensitive (S), were present. However, there was colocalization of the two opsins in many cones across the retina (35 - 96% dual pigment cones). Pure L cones and S cones formed smaller populations. This probably results in poor colour discrimination. Thyroid hormones, important regulators of cone opsin expression, showed normal blood serum levels. The relatively low rod density and hence a relatively thin retina may be related to the fact that the aardvark retina is avascular and its oxygen and nutrient supply have to come from the choriocapillaris by diffusion. In contrast to some previous studies, we found that the aardvark eye has a reflective tapetum lucidum with features of a choroidal tapetum fibrosum, in front of which the retinal pigment epithelium is unpigmented. The discussion considers these findings from a comparative perspective.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
3th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.