bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
SpatialTRACE predicts anatomical axes and regions in spatial transcriptomics and microscopy
Alexander MonelliD, Aishwarya A. GogateiD, Dhruv Patravali, Kathleen AbadieiD, Gene Wei-Ming YeoiD, Ananda W. GoldrathiD, Maximilian HeegiD
Abstract
Spatial transcriptomics measures gene expression in tissue sections. However, interpretation requires anatomical maps that link gene expression and cellular composition to tissue structure. Annotating entire sections often requires extensive manual labor. We developed SpatialTRACE (Tissue Region and Axis Coordinate Estimation), consisting of graph- and image-based models, to extend annotations of a few structures into tissue-wide maps of anatomical axes and regions. SpatialTRACE-Graph combines gene-expression profiles with spatial neighborhoods to predict anatomical coordinates or region membership throughout spatial transcriptomic datasets. In held-out mouse small-intestine sections, it predicted crypt-villus and epithelial-distance axis coordinates using as few as 10 annotated training villi and identified Peyer's patches from region annotations. SpatialTRACE-Image predicts the same anatomical axis coordinates and regions across entire tissue images from DAPI alone. This multiscale vision transformer learns from coordinate and region predictions generated by SpatialTRACE-Graph. We applied SpatialTRACE-Image to immunofluorescence images to map the anatomical distribution of antigen-specific P14 CD8 T cells responding to acute systemic infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) Armstrong in the small intestine. Compared with the vehicle-treated section, a section treated with a retinoic acid receptor inhibitor contained fewer P14 CD8 T cells overall, with a smaller fraction in the upper-villus lamina propria and a relative enrichment in the muscularis. Overall, the SpatialTRACE models reduce repeated manual annotation and provide a route to extend anatomical maps learned from spatial transcriptomics to DAPI-containing microscopy data.
- organism: mouse
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- assay: imaging
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- approach: graph neural network
- approach: transformer / foundation model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- VINTER: a generative vision-language model for annotating and interrogating spatial tissues
Wu JinYu, Wanzhe Xu, … Kenta Nakai·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2026
- SpaTM: Topic Models for Inferring Spatially Informed Transcriptional Programs
Adrien Osakwe, Wenqi Dong, … Yue Li·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025
- SpacGPA: annotating spatial transcriptomes through de novo interpretable gene programs
Yupu Xu, Lirui Chen, Shisong Ma·bioRxiv·Oct 1, 2025
- Vesalius: high-resolution in silico anatomization of Spatial Transcriptomic data using Image Analysis
Patrick C. N. Martin, Hyobin Kim, … Kyoung‐Jae Won·Molecular Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2022
- SECE: accurate identification of spatial domain by incorporating global spatial proximity and local expression proximity
Yuanyuan Yu, Yao He, Zhi Xie·BiomoleculesPeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2024
- Reference-Informed Spatial Domain Detection Using Weak Supervision for Spatial Transcriptomics
Xin Ma, Weijia Jin, … Li Chen·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 3, 2026