bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Evaluation of a nanopore sequencing strategy on bacterial communities from marine sediments
Alice Lemoinne, Guillaume DirbergiD, Myriam Georges, Tony RobinetiD
Abstract
Following the development of high-throughput DNA sequencers, environmental prokaryotic communities were usually described by metabarcoding on short markers of the 16S domain. Among third generation sequencers, that offered the possibility to sequence the full 16s domain, the portable MinION from Oxford Nanopore was undervalued for metabarcoding because of its relatively higher error rate per read. Here we illustrate the limits and benefits of Nanopore sequencing devices by comparing the prokaryotic community structure in a mock community and 52 sediment samples from mangrove sites, inferred from full-length 16S long-reads (16S-FL, ca. 1.5 kpb) on a MinION device, with those inferred from partial 16S short-reads (16S- V4V5, ca. 0.4kpb, 16S-V4V5) on Illumina MiSeq. 16S-V4V5 and 16S-FL retrieved all the bacterial species from the mock, but Nanopore long-reads overestimated their diversity more than twice. Whether these supplementary OTUs were artefactual or not, they only accounted for ca. 10% of the reads. From the sediment samples, with a coverage-based rarefaction of reads and after singletons filtering, Mantel and Procrustean tests of co-inertia showed that bacterial community structures inferred from 16S-V4V5 and 16S- FL were significantly similar, showing both a comparable contrast between sites and a coherent sea-land orientation within sites. In our dataset, 84.7 and 98.8% of the 16S-V4V5 assigned reads were assigned strictly to the same species and genus, respectively, than those detected by 16S-FL. 16S-FL allowed to detect 92.2% of the 309 families and 87.7% of the 448 genera that were detected by the short 16S-V4V5. 16S-FL recorded 973 additional species and 392 genus not detected by 16S-V4V5 (31.5 and 10.4% of the 16S-FL reads, respectively, among which 67.8 and 79.3% were assigned), producted by both primer specificities and diffrent error rates. Thus, our results concluded to an overall similarity between 16S-V4V5 and 16S-FL sequencing strategies for this type of environmental samples.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 8
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluation of full-length 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies for diversity surveys of understudied microbiomes
Yifan V. Li, Raúl A. González‐Pech, … Mónica Medina·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2025
- Evaluation of Oxford Nanopore MinION Sequencing for 16S rRNA Microbiome Characterization
Xiao Ma, Elyse Stachler, Kyle Bibby·bioRxiv·Jan 29, 2017
- A computational strategy for rapid on-site 16S metabarcoding with Oxford Nanopore sequencing
Stefano Maria Marino·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2020
- From short to long reads: enhanced protist diversity profiling via Nanopore metabarcoding
Małgorzata Chwalińska, Michał Karlicki, … Anna Karnkowska·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2025
- Microbial diversity characterization of seawater in a pilot study using Oxford Nanopore Technologies long-read sequencing
Michael K. Liem, Tonny J. G. Regensburg‐Tuïnk, … Herman P. Spaink·BMC Research NotesPeer-reviewed·Feb 2, 2021
- Multi-Locus And Long Amplicon Sequencing Approach To Study Microbial Diversity At Species Level Using The MinION™ Portable Nanopore Sequencer
A. Benitez-Paez, Y. Sanz·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2017