henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivSystems BiologyPreprint

Ratio-based quantitative multiomics profiling using universal reference materials empowers data integration

Yuanting ZhengiD, Yaqing LiuiD, Jingcheng YangiD, Lianhua DongiD, Rui ZhangiD, Sha TianiD, Ying YuiD, Luyao ReniD, Wanwan HouiD, Feng ZhuiD, Yuanbang Mai, Jinxiong Han, Lijun ZhangiD, Hui JiangiD, Ling LiniD, Jingwei Lou, Ruiqiang LiiD, Jingchao Lin, Huafen Liu, Ziqing KongiD, Depeng WangiD, Fangping Dai, Bao Fu DingiD, Zehui CaoiD, Qiaochu CheniD, , Leming M. ShiiD

PDFDOI

Abstract

Multiomics profiling is a powerful tool to characterize the same samples with complementary features orchestrating the genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome. However, the lack of ground truth hampers the objective assessment of and subsequent choice from a plethora of measurement and computational methods aiming to integrate diverse and often enigmatically incomparable omics datasets. Here we establish and characterize the first suites of publicly available multiomics reference materials of matched DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolites derived from immortalized cell lines from a family quartet of parents and monozygotic twin daughters, providing built-in truth defined by family relationship and the central dogma. We demonstrate that the "ratio"-based omics profiling data, i.e., by scaling the absolute feature values of a study sample relative to those of a concurrently measured universal reference sample, were inherently much more reproducible and comparable across batches, labs, platforms, and omics types, thus empower the horizontal (within-omics) and vertical (cross-omics) data integration in multiomics studies. Our study identifies "absolute" feature quantitation as the root cause of irreproducibility in multiomics measurement and data integration, and urges a paradigm shift from "absolute" to "ratio"-based multiomics profiling with universal reference materials.

Citations
0

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISZhang '22Yu '23Yang '23Liu '25Guan '26Xiao '24
63% semantic matchSystems Biology
Naixin Zhang, Peipei Zhang, Qiaochu Chen+10 more·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2022· 10 citations