Systematic evaluation of transcriptomics-based deconvolution methods and references using thousands of clinical samples
Brian B. Nadel, Meritxell Oliva, Benjamin L. Shou, Keith Mitchell, Feiyang Ma, Dennis J. Montoya, Alice Mouton, Sarah Kim-Hellmuth, Barbara E. Stranger, Matteo A. Pellegrini, Serghei Mangul
This study evaluates ten deconvolution tools on 4,000 clinical and synthetic samples, finding EPIC performs best on Framingham data and HPCA references are generally accurate.
Briefings in Bioinformatics · Jun 25, 2021Peer-reviewedBioinformatics