PLoS Computational BiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Modeling bi-modality improves characterization of cell cycle on gene expression in single cells
Lucas Dennis, Andrew McDavidiD, Patrick Danaher, Greg FinakiD, Michael Krouse, Alice Wang, Philippa Webster, Joseph Beechem, Raphael Gottardo
Abstract
Advances in high-throughput, single cell gene expression are allowing interrogation of cell heterogeneity. However, there is concern that the cell cycle phase of a cell might bias characterizations of gene expression at the single-cell level. We assess the effect of cell cycle phase on gene expression in single cells by measuring 333 genes in 930 cells across three phases and three cell lines. We determine each cells phase non-invasively without chemical arrest and use it as a covariate in tests of differential expression. We observe bi-modal gene expression, a previously-described phenomenon, wherein the expression of otherwise abundant genes is either strongly positive, or undetectable within individual cells. This bi-modality is likely both biologically and technically driven. Irrespective of its source, we show that it should be modeled to draw accurate inferences from single cell expression experiments. To this end, we propose a semi-continuous modeling framework based on the generalized linear model, and use it to characterize genes with consistent cell cycle effects across three cell lines. Our new computational framework improves the detection of previously characterized cell-cycle genes compared to approaches that do not account for the bi-modality of single-cell data. We use our semi-continuous modelling framework to estimate single cell gene co-expression networks. These networks suggest that in addition to having phase-dependent shifts in expression (when averaged over many cells), some, but not all, canonical cell cycle genes tend to be co-expressed in groups in single cells. We estimate the amount of single cell expression variability attributable to the cell cycle. We find that the cell cycle explains only 5%-17% of expression variability, suggesting that the cell cycle will not tend to be a large nuisance factor in analysis of the single cell transcriptome.
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Modeling progression of single cell populations through the cell cycle as a sequence of switches
Andrei Y. Zinovyev, Michail Sadovsky, … Alexander N. Gorban·Frontiers in Molecular BiosciencesPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2022
- Automated cell cycle and cell size measurements for single-cell gene expression studies
A. Guillemin, A. Richard, … O. Gandrillon·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2017
- Cell-cycle dependence of bursty gene expression: insights from fitting mechanistic models to single-cell RNA-seq data
Augustinas Sukys, Ramon Grima·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 31, 2025
- The transcriptome dynamics of single cells during the cell cycle
Daniel Schwabe, Sara Formichetti, … Nikolaus Rajewsky·Molecular Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2020
- Detecting Rhythmic Gene Expression in Single Cell Transcriptomics
Bingxian Xu, Dingbang Ma, … Rosemary Braun·Journal of Biological RhythmsPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2024
- Analysis of single-cell gene pair coexpression landscapes by stochastic kinetic modeling reveals gene-pair interactions in development
Cameron P. Gallivan, Honglei Ren, Elizabeth L. Read·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 31, 2020