Propidium monoazide (PMA) with quantitative PCR to detect and quantify viable Paenibacillus larvae and Melissococcus plutonius in honeybee hive samples
Anuja ShresthaiD, Brandon Kingsley HopkinsiD, James T. Van LeuveniD
Abstract
Paenibacillus larvae and Melissococcus plutonius are the bacterial agents responsible for American and European foulbrood diseases, respectively, and pose significant economic threats to apiculture worldwide. Early detection of these pathogens is critical for effective disease prevention and management in honeybee colonies. P. larvae forms highly persistent spores that can remain infectious on hive equipment for decades, whereas the non-spore-forming M. plutonius can survive for over a year in contaminated materials. Although various decontamination and treatment strategies are available or under development, reliable methods for quantifying these pathogens are essential for accurately assessing their effectiveness. Culture-based techniques and quantitative PCR (qPCR) are commonly used to detect and quantify foulbrood pathogens in hive-associated samples; however, culturing is labor-intensive and sometimes inconsistent, while qPCR does not distinguish between viable and dead cells. Propidium monoazide (PMA) selectively binds DNA from dead cells and prevents its amplification during qPCR, enabling viable-cell quantification. Despite this advantage, the performance of PMA-qPCR for detecting P. larvae and M. plutonius in hive samples has not previously been assessed. In this study, we evaluated PMA-qPCR using both pure cultures and environmentally relevant honeycomb samples before and after ozone treatment. PMA treatment greatly reduced the erroneous detection of dead cells by several orders of magnitude in both culture and hive samples, supporting its utility for AFB and EFB risk assessment and treatment evaluation. However, incomplete suppression of dead-cell DNA at high cell densities indicates that further optimization of PMA treatment conditions may be necessary.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantitative PCR (qPCR) vs culture-dependent detection to assess honey contamination by Paenibacillus larvae
S. Crudele, L. Ricchiuti, … F. Rossi·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2019
- The Foster method: Rapid and non-invasive detection of clinically significant American Foulbrood disease levels using eDNA sampling and a dual-target qPCR assay, with its potential for other hive pathogens.
J. Mackay, R. E. Hewett, … J. S. Scandrett·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2021
- Efficacy of two commercial disinfectants on Paenibacillus larvae spores
J. Kiriamburi, A. Nilsson, … E. Forsgren·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2021
- Hive-associated bacteria improve honeybee survival during Paenibacillus larvae infection
Anuja Shrestha, Yva Eline, … James T. Van Leuven·bioRxiv·Dec 25, 2025
- Ecology and pathogenicity for honey bee brood of recently described Paenibacillus melissococcoides and comparison with Paenibacillus dendritiformis, Paenibacillus thiaminolyticus
Florine Ory, Benjamin Dainat, … Vincent Dietemann·Environmental Microbiology ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2025
- Phospholipase A2 activity is required for immune defense of European (Apis mellifera) and Asian (Apis cerana) honeybees against the American foulbrood pathogen, Paenibacillus larvae
G. Jin, M. T. H. Hrithik, … Y. Kim·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2023