bioRxivMicrobiology
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) vs culture-dependent detection to assess honey contamination by Paenibacillus larvae
Abstract
The detection/quantification in honey of spores of the bacterial pathogen Paenibacillus larvae, the etiological agent of the American Foulbrood (AFB) infectious disease of honey bee, represents a useful diagnostic tool to identify apiaries at risk of infection and carry out focused prevention measures. Plate count is currently the recommended method used to analyze presence and number of spores for this pathogen. However, its validity needs to be re-assessed since P. larvae field strains have a low rate of germination in culture media.\n\nTherefore, in this study, culture-dependent P. larvae detection/quantification was compared with quantitative PCR (qPCR) based analysis for 139 honey samples collected in 2017 and 2018 from as many apiaries in the Abruzzo region. According to qPCR based detection, 58.27% samples were positive for P. larvae, while only 33.8 % samples were positive by plate count.\n\nMoreover, the levels of contamination with the two methods differed for most samples. Potential false positives were obtained by plate count for 12.9% samples that were negative with the qPCR test. On the other hand, 26.6% samples were culture negative but qPCR positive, suggesting that not all the field strains were able to develop in plate. This was confirmed by obtaining P. larvae growth from those samples after supplementing the medium with germination stimulants.\n\nResults strongly suggested the necessity to improve culture methods or replace them with molecular detection/quantification for a more reliable AFB risk estimation.
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Propidium monoazide (PMA) with quantitative PCR to detect and quantify viable Paenibacillus larvae and Melissococcus plutonius in honeybee hive samples
Anuja Shrestha, Brandon Kingsley Hopkins, James T. Van Leuven·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2026
- The Foster method: Rapid and non-invasive detection of clinically significant American Foulbrood disease levels using eDNA sampling and a dual-target qPCR assay, with its potential for other hive pathogens.
J. Mackay, R. E. Hewett, … J. S. Scandrett·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2021
- Efficacy of two commercial disinfectants on Paenibacillus larvae spores
J. Kiriamburi, A. Nilsson, … E. Forsgren·bioRxiv·Mar 16, 2021
- Hive-associated bacteria improve honeybee survival during Paenibacillus larvae infection
Anuja Shrestha, Yva Eline, … James T. Van Leuven·bioRxiv·Dec 25, 2025
- Ecology and pathogenicity for honey bee brood of recently described Paenibacillus melissococcoides and comparison with Paenibacillus dendritiformis, Paenibacillus thiaminolyticus
Florine Ory, Benjamin Dainat, … Vincent Dietemann·Environmental Microbiology ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2025
- Phospholipase A2 activity is required for immune defense of European (Apis mellifera) and Asian (Apis cerana) honeybees against the American foulbrood pathogen, Paenibacillus larvae
G. Jin, M. T. H. Hrithik, … Y. Kim·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2023