PLoS ONEBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
A machine learning algorithm predicts molecular subtypes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with differential response to gemcitabine-based versus FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy
Georgios A. KaissisiD, Sebastian ZiegelmayeriD, Fabian Karl LohöferiD, Katja SteigeriD, Hana AlgüliD, Alexander MuckenhuberiD, Hsi-Yu YeniD, Ernst J. RummenyiD, Helmut Frieß, Roland Michael SchmidiD, Wilko WeichertiD, Jens Thomas SivekeiD, Rickmer BrareniD
Abstract
PurposeDevelopment of a supervised machine-learning model capable of predicting clinically relevant molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from diffusion-weighted-imaging-derived radiomic features.\n\nMethodsThe retrospective observational study assessed 55 surgical PDAC patients. Molecular subtypes were defined by immunohistochemical staining of KRT81. Tumors were manually segmented and 1606 radiomic features were extracted with PyRadiomics. A gradient-boosted-tree algorithm (XGBoost) was trained on 70% of the patients (N=28) and tested on 30% (N=17) to predict KRT81+ vs. KRT81-tumor subtypes. The average sensitivity, specificity and ROC-AUC value were calculated. Chemotherapy response was assessed stratified by subtype. Radiomic feature importance was ranked.\n\nResultsThe mean{+/-}STDEV sensitivity, specificity and ROC-AUC were 0.90{+/-}0.07, 0.92{+/-}0.11, and 0.93{+/-}0.07, respectively. Patients with a KRT81+ subtype experienced significantly diminished median overall survival compared to KRT81-patients (7.0 vs. 22.6 months, HR 1.44, log-rank-test P=<0.001) and a significantly improved response to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy over FOLFIRINOX (10.14 vs. 3.8 months median overall survival, HR 0.85, P=0.037) compared to KRT81-patients, who responded significantly better to FOLFIRINOX over gemcitabine-based treatment (30.8 vs. 13.4 months median overall survival, HR 0.88, P=0.027).\n\nConclusionsThe machine-learning based analysis of radiomic features enables the prediction of subtypes of PDAC, which are highly relevant for overall patient survival and response to chemotherapy.
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 76
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A prospectively validated machine learning model for the prediction of survival and tumor subtype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Georgios A. Kaissis, Sebastian Ziegelmayer, … Rickmer Braren·European Radiology ExperimentalPeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2019
- PACpAInt: a deep learning approach to identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic adenocarcinoma on histology slides
C. Saillard, F. Delecourt, … J. Cros·bioRxiv·Jan 4, 2022
- The Limits of Molecular Signatures for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Subtyping
Manuela Lautizi, Jan Baumbach, … Tim Kacprowski·NAR CancerPeer-reviewed·Sep 28, 2022
- Establishment of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma molecular gradient (PAMG) that predicts the clinical outcome of pancreatic cancer
R. Nicolle, Y. Blum, … N. J. Dusetti·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2020
- An unbiased high-throughput drug screen reveals a potential therapeutic vulnerability in the most lethal molecular subtype of pancreatic cancer
C.-H. Pan, Y. Otsuka, … K. R. Shroyer·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2019
- DEVELOPMENT OF A CONSENSUS MOLECULAR CLASSIFIER FOR PANCREATIC DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA
Pablo Villoslada-Blanco, Lola Alonso, … Núria Malats·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2025