The kinetics and basal levels of the transcriptome response during Effector-Triggered Immunity in Arabidopsis are mainly controlled by four immune signaling sectors
Rachel HillmeriD, Daisuke Igarashi, Thomas Stoddard, You LuiD, Xiaotong LiuiD, Kenichi TsudaiD, Fumiaki KatagiriiD
Abstract
To observe the transcriptome response during Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI) without complications from any other pathogen factors or heterogeneously responding cell populations, we transgenically and conditionally expressed the Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrRpt2 in Arabidopsis leaves. We studied this ETI-specific, cell-autonomous transcriptome response in 16 exhaustively combinatorial genetic backgrounds for the jasmonate (JA), ethylene (ET), PAD4, and salicylate (SA) immune signaling sectors. Removal of some or all four sectors had relatively small impacts on the intensity of the overall ETI transcriptome response (1972 upregulated and 1290 downregulated genes). Yet, we found that the four signaling sectors strongly affect the kinetics of the ETI transcriptome response based on analysis of individual genes via time-course modeling and of the collective behaviors of the genes via a PCA-based method: the PAD4 sector alone and the JA;SA sector interaction (defined by the averaging model) accelerated the response, while the ET;SA sector interaction delayed it. The response acceleration by the PAD4 sector or the JA;SA sector interaction was consistent with their positive contributions to ETI measured by pathogen growth inhibition. The responsive genes overlapping between ETI and Pattern-Triggered Immunity (PTI) had distinct regulatory trends regarding the four sectors, indicating different regulatory circuits in upstream parts of ETI and PTI signaling. The basal mRNA levels of most ETI-upregulated genes, but not downregulated genes, were predominantly positively regulated by the PAD4;SA sector interaction. This detailed mechanistic decomposition of the roles of four signaling sectors allowed us to propose a potential regulatory network involved in ETI signaling.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Field percentile
- top 41%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transcriptional reprogramming during effector/flg22-triggered immune is independent of defense phytohormone signaling networks
Nailou Zhang, Zhijin Fan·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2020
- Dynamic decomposition of transcriptome responses during plant effector-triggered immunity revealed conserved responses in two distinct cell populations
Xiaotong Liu, Daisuke Igarashi, … Fumiaki Katagiri·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2022
- Modular mechanisms of immune priming and growth inhibition mediated by plant effector-triggered immunity
Himanshu Chhillar, Hoang Hung Nguyen, … Pingtao Ding·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2025
- Cell-type-specific execution of effector-triggered immunity
Himanshu Chhillar, Leonardo Jo, … Pingtao Ding·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2025
- Cell-type specific gating of gene regulatory modules as a hallmark of early immune responses in Arabidopsis leaves
Shanshan Wang, Ilja Bezrukov, … Detlef Weigel·New PhytologistPeer-reviewed·Jan 7, 2026
- Activation of TIR signaling is required for pattern-triggered immunity