Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition
Joseph Bemister-Buffington, Alex J. Wolf, Sebastian RaschkaiD, Leslie A. KuhniD
Abstract
We show that machine learning can pinpoint features distinguishing inactive from active states in proteins, in particular identifying key ligand binding site flexibility transitions in GPCRs that are triggered by biologically active ligands. Our analysis was performed on the helical segments and loops in 18 inactive and 9 active class A GPCRs. These 3-dimensional structures were determined in complex with ligands. However, considering the flexible versus rigid state identified by graph-theoretic ProFlex rigidity analysis for each helix and loop segment with the ligand removed, followed by feature selection and k-nearest neighbor classification, was sufficient to identify four segments surrounding the ligand binding site whose flexibility/rigidity accurately predicts whether a GPCR is in an active or inactive state. GPCRs bound to inhibitors were similar in their pattern of flexible versus rigid regions, whereas agonist-bound GPCRs were more flexible and diverse. This new ligand-proximal flexibility signature of GPCR activity was identified without knowledge of the ligand binding mode or previously defined switch regions, while being adjacent to the known transmission switch. Following this proof of concept, the ProFlex flexibility analysis coupled with pattern recognition and activity classification may be useful for predicting whether newly designed ligands behave as activators or inhibitors, based on the pattern of flexibility they induce in the protein.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 37
- FWCI
- 1.70
- Field percentile
- top 16%
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Activation mechanism of class A GPCRs: machine learninganalysis of experimental structural databases
Santeri Elias Paajanen, Felix Eurasto, … Ilpo Vattulainen·bioRxiv·Mar 27, 2026
- Activity Map and Transition Pathways of G Protein Coupled Receptor Revealed by Machine Learning
P. Mollaei, A. Barati farimani·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2022
- Identification of ligand-specific G-protein coupled receptor states and prediction of downstream efficacy via data-driven modeling
O. Fleetwood, J. Carlsson, L. Delemotte·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2021
- Thermodynamic Architecture and Conformational Plasticity of GPCRs
S. Anantakrishnan, A. N. Naganathan·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2022
- Multi-state Modeling of G-protein Coupled Receptors at Experimental Accuracy
- Visualizing the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor activation regulated by aromatic ring dynamics
Zhou Gong, Xu Zhang, … Yunfei Hu·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2025