Multi-center integrated analysis of non-coding CRISPR screens
David YaoiD, Josh TyckoiD, Jin Woo OhiD, Lexi R. BoundsiD, Sager J. GosaiiD, Lazaros LataniotisiD, Ava Mackay-SmithiD, Benjamin R. DoughtyiD, Idan GabdankiD, Henri SchmidtiD, Ingrid YoungworthiD, Kalina AndreevaiD, Xingjie ReniD, Alejandro BarreraiD, Yunhai LuoiD, Keith SiklenkaiD, Galip Gürkan YardımcıiD, Ryan TewheyiD, Anshul Bharat KundajeiD, William James GreenleafiD, Pardis Christine SabetiiD, Christina S. LeslieiD, Yuri PritykiniD, Jill E. MooreiD, M BeeriD, , Steven K. ReillyiD
Abstract
The ENCODE Consortiums efforts to annotate non-coding, cis-regulatory elements (CREs) have advanced our understanding of gene regulatory landscapes which play a major role in health and disease. Pooled, non-coding CRISPR screens are a promising approach for systematically investigating gene regulatory mechanisms. Here, the ENCODE Functional Characterization Centers report 109 screens comprising 346,970 individual perturbations across 13.3Mb of the genome, using a variety of methods, readouts, and statistical analyses. Across 332 functionally confirmed CRE-gene links, we identify principles for screening endogenous, non-coding elements for causal regulatory mechanisms. Nearly all CREs show strong evidence of open chromatin, and targeting accessibility peak summits is a critical component of our proposed sgRNA design rules. We provide experimental guidelines to accurately detect CREs with variable, often low, transcriptional effects. We discover a previously undescribed DNA strand-bias for CRISPRi in transcribed regions with implications for screen design and analysis. Benchmarking five screen analysis tools, we find CASA produces the most conservative CRE calls and is robust to artifacts of low-specificity sgRNAs. Together, we provide an accessible data resource, predesigned sgRNAs targeting 3,275,697 ENCODE SCREEN candidate CREs, and screening guidelines to accelerate functional characterization of the non-coding genome.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CRISPR-Decryptr reveals cis-regulatory elements from noncoding perturbation screens
Anders W. Rasmussen, Tarmo Äijö, … Richard Bonneau·bioRxiv·Aug 13, 2020
- Identification and mitigation of pervasive off-target activity in CRISPR-Cas9 screens for essential non-coding elements
Josh Tycko, Michael Wainberg, … Michael Cory Bassik·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2019
- Computational prediction of CRISPR-impaired non-coding regulatory regions
Nina Baumgarten, Florian Schmidt, … Marcel H. Schulz·Biological ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Mar 2, 2021
- HCR-FlowFISH: A flexible CRISPR screening method to identify cis-regulatory elements and their target genes
Steven K. Reilly, Sager J. Gosai, … Ryan Tewhey·bioRxiv·May 11, 2020
- Parallel Characterization of cis-Regulatory Elements for Multiple Genes Using CRISPRpath
Xingjie Ren, Mengchi Wang, … Yin Shen·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2021
- CRISPR-SURF: Discovering regulatory elements by deconvolution of CRISPR tiling screen data
Jonathan Y. Hsu, Charles P. Fulco, … Luca Pinello·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2018