Nature CommunicationsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Identification and mitigation of pervasive off-target activity in CRISPR-Cas9 screens for essential non-coding elements
Josh TyckoiD, Michael WainbergiD, Georgi K. MarinoviD, Oana UrsuiD, Gaelen T. HessiD, Braeden K. EgoiD, AradhanaiD, Amy LiiD, Alisa Truong, Alexandro E. TrevinoiD, Kaitlyn K. Spees, David YaoiD, Irene M. KaplowiD, Peyton Greenside, David W. MorgensiD, Douglas H. PhanstieliD, Michael P. SnyderiD, Lacramioara BintuiD, William James GreenleafiD, Anshul Bharat KundajeiD, Michael Cory BassikiD
Abstract
Pooled CRISPR-Cas9 screens have recently emerged as a powerful method for functionally characterizing regulatory elements in the non-coding genome, but off-target effects in these experiments have not been systematically evaluated. Here, we conducted a genome-scale screen for essential CTCF loop anchors in the K562 leukemia cell line. Surprisingly, the primary drivers of signal in this screen were single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) with low specificity scores. After removing these guides, we found that there were no CTCF loop anchors critical for cell growth. We also observed this effect in an independent screen fine-mapping the core motifs in enhancers of the GATA1 gene. We then conducted screens in parallel with CRISPRi and CRISPRa, which do not induce DNA damage, and found that an unexpected and distinct set of off-targets also caused strong confounding growth effects with these epigenome-editing platforms. Promisingly, strict filtering of CRISPRi libraries using GuideScan specificity scores removed these confounded sgRNAs and allowed for the identification of essential enhancers, which we validated extensively. Together, our results show off-target activity can severely limit identification of essential functional motifs by active Cas9, while strictly filtered CRISPRi screens can be reliably used for assaying larger regulatory elements.
- organism: human
- assay: CRISPR screen
- research focus: perturbation response prediction
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 148
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multi-center integrated analysis of non-coding CRISPR screens
David Yao, Josh Tycko, … Steven K. Reilly·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2022
- Computational correction of off-targeting for CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens
Alexendar R. Perez, Laura Sala, … Joana Alves Vidigal·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2020
- Multiple-gene targeting and mismatch tolerance can confound analysis of genome-wide pooled CRISPR screens
Jean‐Philippe Fortin, Jenille Tan, … Scott E. Martin·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2019
- Pooled CRISPR screening at high sensitivity with an empirically designed sgRNA library
Luisa Henkel, Benedikt Rauscher, … Michael Boutros·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2020
- Multi-locus CRISPRi targeting with a single truncated guide RNA
Molly M. Moore, Siddarth Wekhande, … Fadi J. Najm·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2025
- Parallel Characterization of cis-Regulatory Elements for Multiple Genes Using CRISPRpath
Xingjie Ren, Mengchi Wang, … Yin Shen·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Sep 15, 2021