bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Systematic Benchmarking of High-Throughput Subcellular Spatial Transcriptomics Platforms
Pengfei ReniD, Rui ZhangiD, Yunfeng WangiD, Peng ZhangiD, Ce LuoiD, Suyan WangiD, Xiaohong LiiD, Zongxu ZhangiD, Yanping ZhaoiD, Yufeng HeiD, Haorui ZhangiD, Yufeng LiiD, Zhidong GaoiD, Xiuping ZhangiD, Yahui Zhao, Zhihua LiuiD, Yuanguang MengiD, Zhe Zhang, Zexian ZengiD
Abstract
Recent advancements in spatial transcriptomics technologies have significantly enhanced resolution and throughput, underscoring an urgent need for systematic benchmarking. To address this, we collected clinical samples from three cancer types - colon adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and ovarian cancer - and generated serial tissue sections for systematic evaluation. Using these uniformly processed samples, we generated spatial transcriptomics data across five high-throughput platforms with subcellular resolution: Stereo-seq v1.3, Visium HD FFPE, Visium HD FF, CosMx 6K, and Xenium 5K. To establish ground truth datasets, we profiled proteins from adjacent tissue sections corresponding to all five platforms using CODEX and performed single-cell RNA sequencing on the same samples. Leveraging manual cell segmentation and detailed annotations, we systematically assessed each platforms performance across key metrics, including capture sensitivity, specificity, diffusion control, cell segmentation, cell annotation, spatial clustering, and transcript-protein alignment with adjacent CODEX. The uniformly generated, processed, and annotated multi-omics dataset is valuable for advancing computational method development and biological discoveries. The dataset is accessible via SPATCH, a user-friendly web server for visualization and download (http://spatch.pku-genomics.org/).
- organism: human
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 10
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benchmarking of spatial transcriptomics platforms across six cancer types
Sergi Cervilla, Daniela Grases, … Eduard Porta‐Pardo·bioRxiv·May 21, 2024
- A Comparative Analysis of Imaging-Based Spatial Transcriptomics Platforms
David P. Cook, Kirk B. Jensen, … Luciano Gastón Martelotto·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2023
- Navigating the rapidly evolving landscape of sequencing-based spatial transcriptomics technologies: a comprehensive multi-platform benchmark
Julien Mortier, Isabelle Scheyltjens, … Evelien Van Hamme·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2026
- Comparison of imaging-based single-cell resolution spatial transcriptomics profiling platforms using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples
Nejla Ozirmak Lermi, Max Molina Ayala, … Luisa M. Solis Soto·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 26, 2025
- Systematic comparison of sequencing-based spatial transcriptomic methods
Yue You, Yuting Fu, … Luyi Tian·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jul 4, 2024
- An experimental comparison of the Digital Spatial Profiling and Visium spatial transcriptomics technologies for cancer research
T. Wang, K. Harvey, … A. Swarbrick·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2023