Andexanet alfa-associated heparin resistance in cardiac surgery: mechanism and in vitro perspectives

Abstract

BackgroundAndexanet alfa (andexanet) is the only FDA-approved antidote for direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors but has been reported to cause resistance to unfractionated heparin (UFH). This has delayed anticoagulation for procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The mechanism, andexanet and UFH dose dependence, and thrombotic risk of andexanet-associated heparin resistance are unknown. MethodsThe effect of andexanet in vitro was determined using activated clotting times (ACT) and thromboelastography (TEG). Ex vivo CPB circuits were used to determine whether andexanet impaired anticoagulation for extracorporeal circulation. Kinetics of antithrombin (AT) inhibition of FXa and thrombin were measured in the presence of andexanet. Equilibrium modeling and thrombin generation assay (TGA) validation were used to predict the role of andexanet, AT, and UFH concentrations in andexanet-associated heparin resistance. ResultsAndexanet prevented UFH-mediated prolongation of ACT and TEG times. At lower concentrations of andexanet, heparin resistance could be overcome with suprapharmacologic doses of UFH, but not at higher andexanet concentrations. Andexanet rendered standard doses of UFH inadequate to prevent circuit thrombosis, and suprapharmacologic UFH doses were only partially able to overcome this. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated coagulation activation in circuits. Andexanet prevented UFH enhancement of AT-mediated inhibition of FXa and thrombin. Equilibrium modeling and TGA validation demonstrated that andexanet creates a triphasic equilibrium with UFH and AT: initial UFH unresponsiveness, normal UFH responsiveness when andexanet is depleted, and finally AT depletion. Sufficient CPB heparinization can only occur at low therapeutic andexanet doses and normal AT levels. Higher andexanet doses or AT deficiency may require both AT supplementation and very high UFH doses. ConclusionsAndexanet causes heparin resistance due to redistribution of UFH-bound AT. If andexanet cannot be avoided prior to heparinization and direct thrombin inhibitors are undesirable, our in vitro study suggests excess UFH should be considered as a potential strategy prior to AT supplementation. HighlightsO_LIAndexanet alfa causes heparin resistance not by depleting antithrombin, but rather by sequestering heparin-bound antithrombin such that it cannot act as an anticoagulant. C_LIO_LIHeparin responsiveness in the presence of Andexanet alfa is triphasic such that the effect of a dose of heparin can now be predicted in vitro based on the relative concentrations of andexanet, heparin, and antithrombin. C_LIO_LIThe in vitro insights provided by this work provide a rational starting point for further clinical elucidation of the problem and management of andexanet-associated heparin resistance C_LI