GBactPro: cross-species bacterial promoter prediction using element-resolved promoter definitions
Hsiang-Yu Han, Yu-Chien Vicky Kao, Syue-Ting Antony KuoiD, Hsin-Hung David ChouiD, Jia‐Ming ChangiD
Abstract
Accurate bacterial promoter prediction supports genome annotation, but many models use fixed-length promoter windows anchored to transcription start sites (TSSs) rather than promoter-element boundaries. We developed the General Bacterial Promoter Predictor (GBactPro), a convolutional neural network-bidirectional long short-term memory (CNN-BiLSTM) framework using promoter sequences resolved by the Promoter Architecture Scanner. Using Escherichia coli-trained models evaluated across 43 bacterial species, we compared eight input designs and identified the contiguous -35/spacer/-10 core as optimal (mean AUROC = 0.9859). Species-specific models showed broad transfer in a 43 x 43 evaluation. Joint training on all 43 species achieved a mean AUROC of 0.9943 across their held-out test sets and outperformed four established predictors under matched-length benchmarks. In genome-wide E. coli scanning, GBactPro achieved AUROC and AUPRC values of 0.979 and 0.160 under stringent full-containment matching (0-bp tolerance), increasing to 0.997 and 0.323 under a 100-bp tolerance. False-positive predictions overlapped H-NS binding regions more frequently than true positives (24.4% versus 18.8%), and predictions also overlapped promoters derepressed in an H-NS-knockout dataset. Prediction precision varied across four TSS classes. These findings demonstrate that element-resolved promoter definitions improve cross-species prediction and support genome-wide identification of candidate bacterial promoters.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benchmarking available bacterial promoter prediction tools: potentialities and limitations
Murilo Henrique Anzolini Cassiano, Rafael Silva‐Rocha·mSystemsPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2020
- Promotech: A general tool for bacterial promoter recognition
Ruben Chevez-Guardado, Lourdes Peña‐Castillo·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 17, 2021
- ProFinder: Candidate constitutive promoter prediction across the bacterial tree for genetic tool development in non-model species
Anupam Gautam, J. Wallis Marsh·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- PromoterAtlas: decoding regulatory sequences across Gammaproteobacteria using a transformer model
Lucas Coppens, Rodrigo Ledesma‐Amaro·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 15, 2026
- PromoR and PromoS for E. coli promoter recognition and classification
Xinglong Wang, Jingwen Zhou·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2023
- BacTermFinder: A Comprehensive and General Bacterial Terminator Finder using a CNN Ensemble
Seyed Mohammad Amin Taheri Ghahfarokhi, Lourdes Peña‐Castillo·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 7, 2025