Nucleosome placement and polymer mechanics explain genomic contacts on 100kbp scales
John Corrette, Jiachun LiiD, Hanjuan Shao, Praveen Krishna VeerasubramanianiD, Andrew J. SpakowitziD, Timothy L. DowningiD, Jun F. AllardiD
Abstract
The 3d organization of the genome -- in particular, which two regions of DNA are in contact with each other -- plays a role in regulating gene expression. Several factors influence genome 3d organization. Nucleosomes (where [~] 100 basepairs of DNA wrap around histone proteins) bend, twist and compactify chromosomal DNA, altering its polymer mechanics. How much does the positioning of nucleosomes between gene loci influence contacts between those gene loci? And, to what extent are polymer mechanics responsible for this? To address this question, we combine a stochastic polymer mechanics model of chromosomal DNA including twists and wrapping induced by nucleosomes with two data-driven pipelines. The first estimates nucleosome positioning from ATACseq data in regions of high accessibility. Most of the genome is low-accessibility, so we combine this with a novel image analysis method that estimates the distribution of nucleosome spacing from electron microscopy data. There are no fit parameters in the biophysical model. We apply this method to IL6, IL15, CXCL9, and CXCL10, inflammatory marker genes in macrophages, before and after inflammatory stimulation, and compare the predictions with contacts measured by conformation capture experiments (4C-seq). We find that within a 500 kilo-basepairs genomic region, polymer mechanics with nucleosomes can explain 71% of close contacts. These results suggest that, while genome contacts on 100kbp-scales are multifactorial, they may be amenable to mechanistic, physical explanation. Our work also highlights the role of nucleosomes, not just at the loci of interest, but between them, and not just the total number of nucleosomes, but their specific placement. The method generalizes to other genes, and can be used to address whether a contact is under active regulation by the cell (e.g., a macrophage during inflammatory stimulation).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Field percentile
- top 44%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The interaction landscape between transcription factors and the nucleosome
Fangjie Zhu, Lucas Farnung, … Jussi Taipale·NaturePeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2018
- Irregular nucleosome positioning governs a crystalline to liquid-like phase transition and tunes chromatin accessibility
Waad Albawardi, Matthew Thomas, … Nick Gilbert·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2026
- A unified computational framework for modeling genome-wide nucleosome landscape
Hu Jin, Alex Finnegan, Jun S. Song·Physical BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2018
- Nuclear position modulates long-range chromatin interactions
E. H. Finn, T. Misteli·bioRxiv·May 31, 2022
- Mobile nucleosomes and the accessibility of transcription factors to DNA: a modified dynamic equilibrium model
Hadeel Khamis, Sergei Rudnizky, Ariel Kaplan·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2017
- Nucleosome positions alone determine micro-domains in yeast chromosomes.
O. Wiese, D. Marenduzzo, C. A. Brackley·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2018