Sign in
BiophysicsbioRxiv
Preprint

Water-Only Look-Locker Inversion recovery (WOLLI) T1 mapping

L. D. Garrison, C. Levick, M. Pavlides, T. Marjot, F. Mozes, L. Hodson, S. Neubauer, M. Robson, C. T. Rodgers

Abstract

PurposeModified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (MOLLI) and Shortened MOLLI (ShMOLLI) T1 values can deviate substantially from the water T1 in voxels containing large amounts of water and fat. We introduce Water-Only Look-Locker Inversion recovery (WOLLI) to map water T1 in tissue containing fat. TheoryWOLLI comprises adiabatic water-selective inversion and several balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) readouts, followed immediately by adiabatic fat-selective inversion and bSSFP readout(s). Data are fitted pixel-wise and an adapted Deichmann-Haase saturation-correction gives the water T1. MethodsWe compared two WOLLI protocols (WOLLI-w7f1 and WOLLI-w7f2f1), ShMOLLI and single-voxel spectroscopy at 3T in: simulations, fat/water phantoms, and 12 subjects livers. ResultsIn simulations with 0-40% fat fraction, T1 varied by: 100% (MOLLI). In phantoms, the accuracy of the methods (i.e. worst-case T1w difference vs spectroscopy) was: WOLLI-w7f1 (best, maximum difference of 10.2%), WOLLI-w7f2f1 (max. 10.5%), and ShMOLLI (max. 81.5%). In the liver, the root-mean-squared deviations vs spectroscopy were: 374ms (WOLLI-w7f1), 645ms (WOLLI-w7f2f1), and 700ms (ShMOLLI). ConclusionCompared to ShMOLLI, WOLLI is less influenced by fat, but more by B0-inhomogeneity. WOLLI was a clear improvement in phantoms but less so in vivo. WOLLI may be suited to scan organs with high fat content such as the liver.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.