Fast and accurate DNASeq Variant Calling workflow composed of LUSH toolkit
Taifu WangiD, Youjin Zhang, Haoling Wang, Qiwen ZhengiD, Jiaobo Yang, Tiefeng ZhangiD, Geng SuniD, Weicong LiuiD, Longhui Yin, Xinqiu He, Rui YouiD, Chu Wang, Zhencheng Liu, Zhijian Liu, Ji-Nan WangiD, Xiangqian Jin, Zengquan He
Abstract
BackgroundWhole genome sequencing (WGS) is becoming increasingly prevalent for molecular diagnosis, staging and prognosis because of its declining costs and the ability to detect nearly all genes associated with a patients disease. The currently widely accepted variant calling pipeline, GATK, is limited in terms of its computational speed and efficiency, which cannot meet the growing analysis needs. MethodsIn this study, we propose a fast and accurate DNASeq variant calling workflow that is purely composed of tools from LUSH toolkit. The LUSH pipeline is highly optimized for the WGS pipeline based on SOAPnuke, BWA and GATK which can be deployed on any general-purpose CPU-based computing system. We validated the accuracy, speed and scalability of the LUSH pipeline on several standard WGS datasets. ResultsOur test results show that the LUSH pipeline and the GATK pipeline are highly consistent in terms of accuracy, achieving over 99% precision and recall on NA12878. For speed, the LUSH pipeline completes 30x WGS data in 1.6 hours, which is about 17x faster than the GATK pipeline. From BAM to VCF, LUSH_HC even takes only 12 minutes, about 76x faster than GATK. Moreover, the LUSH pipeline shows favorable scalability in terms of thread and sequencing depth. ConclusionThe LUSH pipeline provides far superior computational speed to GATK while maintaining a high level of accuracy comparable to that of GATK, which greatly facilitates bedside analysis of acute patients, large-scale cohort data analysis, and variant calling in crop breeding programs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Field percentile
- top 25%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High performance of a GPU-accelerated variant calling tool in genome data analysis
Qian Zhang, Hao Liu, Fengxiao Bu·bioRxiv·Dec 12, 2021
- Accuracy and efficiency of germline variant calling pipelines for human genome data
Sen Zhao, Oleg Agafonov, … Eivind J. Hovig·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2020
- Computational performance and accuracy of Sentieon DNASeq variant calling workflow
Katherine I. Kendig, Saurabh Baheti, … Liudmila Sergeevna Mainzer·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2019
- Comparison of calling pipelines for whole genome sequencing: an empirical study demonstrating the importance of mapping and alignment
Raphael O. Betschart, Alexandre Thiéry, … Andreas Ziegler·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2022
- Validation of Illumina’s Isaac variant calling workflow
Liudmila S. Mainzer, Brad A. Chapman, … C. Victor Jongeneel·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2015
- Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing
Anna Maria Supernat, Oskar Valdimar Vidarsson, … Tomasz Stokowy·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2018