bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
MOSurvivor-Guided Joint CpG Selection and XGBoost Hyperparameter Optimization for Compact Epigenetic Age Prediction
Aref YelghiiD, Shirmohammad TavangariiD, Zahra ShakaramiiD, Sajjad JanfazaiD
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
Accurate epigenetic age prediction from DNA methylation profiles is intrinsically high-dimensional, creating a need for parsimonious models that preserve predictive performance while reducing the number of assayed cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) loci. This study introduces MOSurvivor, a population-based multi-objective search framework that jointly optimizes a weight-threshold CpG selector and eight XGBoost hyperparameters. Experiments used the GSE40279 whole-blood cohort (656 individuals profiled on the Illumina HumanMethylation450 platform). After retaining 1,000 age-correlated CpGs, five strategies were evaluated on the same 30 seeded 80:20 train/test splits: fixed-parameter XGBoost using all 1,000 CpGs, random search, a genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, and MOSurvivor. Internal fitness was estimated using three-fold cross-validation on each training set. Across the 30 held-out test sets, MOSurvivor achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.149 {+/-} 0.300 years, root mean squared error of 5.545 {+/-} 0.392 years, and R2 of 0.855{+/-} 0.027 while retaining 211.6 {+/-} 54.8 CpGs. Relative to full-feature XGBoost (MAE 4.095 {+/-} 0.285 years), MOSurvivor reduced the feature set by 78.8% at an MAE increase of only 0.054 years (1.3%). Paired Wilcoxon tests found no significant accuracy difference between MOSurvivor and any comparator (all unadjusted p > 0.05; all Holm-adjusted p [≥] 0.476). The most recurrent locus, cg16867657, appeared in 29 runs, whereas mean pairwise Jaccard similarity was 0.124, indicating a small stable core embedded in multiple near-equivalent feature subsets. MOSurvivor thus offers a competitive accuracy-parsimony trade-off rather than superior absolute accuracy. External validation and leakage-free nested feature preselection remain necessary before biological or clinical translation. Keywords: epigenetic clock, DNA methylation, feature selection, multi-objective optimization, XGBoost, metaheuristics, biological aging.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- approach: optimal transport
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Refining epigenetic prediction of chronological and biological age
Elena Bernabeu, Daniel L. McCartney, … Riccardo Emilio Marioni·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2023
- Novel feature selection methods for construction of accurate epigenetic clocks
Adam Li, Alice E. Kane, … David A. Sinclair·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2022
- MicroBayesAge: A Maximum Likelihood Approach to Predict Epigenetic Age Using Microarray Data
Nicole Nolan, Megan Mitchell, … Matteo A. Pellegrini·GeroSciencePeer-reviewed·May 30, 2025
- New Targeted Approaches for Epigenetic Age Predictions
Yang Han, Julia Franzen, … Wolfgang Wagner·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 24, 2020
- Common DNA sequence variation influences epigenetic aging in African populations
Gillian L. Meeks, Brooke A. Scelza, … Shyamalika Gopalan·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2024
- BayesAge: A Maximum Likelihood Algorithm To Predict Epigenetic Age
Lajoyce Mboning, Liudmilla Rubbi, … Matteo A. Pellegrini·Frontiers in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 4, 2024