Sign in
NeuroscienceeLife
Peer-reviewed journal article

Asymmetric inheritance of centrosomes maintains stem cell properties in human neural progenitor cells

Lars N. RoyalliD, Diana MachadoiD, Sebastian JessbergeriD, Annina Denoth‐LippuneriD

Abstract

During human forebrain development, neural progenitor cells (NPCs) in the ventricular zone (VZ) undergo asymmetric cell divisions to produce a self-renewed progenitor cell, maintaining the potential to go through additional rounds of cell divisions, and differentiating daughter cells, populating the developing cortex. Previous work in the embryonic rodent brain suggested that the preferential inheritance of the pre-existing (older) centrosome to the self-renewed progenitor cell is required to maintain stem cell properties, ensuring proper neurogenesis. If asymmetric segregation of centrosomes occurs in NPCs of the developing human brain, which depends on unique molecular regulators and species-specific cellular composition, remains unknown. Using a novel, recombination-induced tag exchange (RITE)-based genetic tool to birthdate and track the segregation of centrosomes over multiple cell divisions in human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived regionalized forebrain organoids, we show the preferential inheritance of the older mother centrosome towards self-renewed NPCs. Aberration of asymmetric segregation of centrosomes by genetic manipulation of the centrosomal, microtubule-associated protein Ninein alters fate decisions of NPCs and their maintenance in the VZ of human cortical organoids. Thus, the data described here use a novel genetic approach to birthdate centrosomes in human cells and identify asymmetric inheritance of centrosomes as a mechanism to maintain self-renewal properties and to ensure proper neurogenesis in human NPCs. Impact StatementGenetic birthdating in forebrain organoids shows asymmetric inheritance of centrosomes in human neural progenitor cells, required for proper human neurogenesis.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
27
FWCI
3.14
Field percentile
top 7%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.