Comparative specialization of intrinsic cardiac neurons in humans, mice, and pigs
John D. TompkinsiD, Donald B. HooveriD, Leif A. HavtoniD, Janaki C. Patel, Youngjin ChoiD, Elizabeth H. SmithiD, Natália P. BiscolaiD, Olujimi Adeoluwa AjijolaiD, Kalyanam ShivkumariD, Jeffrey L. ArdelliD
Abstract
Intrinsic cardiac neurons (ICNs) play a crucial role in the proper functioning of the heart; yet a paucity of data pertaining to human ICNs exists. We took a multidisciplinary approach to complete a detailed cellular comparison of the structure and function of ICNs from mice, pigs, and humans. Immunohistochemistry of whole and sectioned ganglia, transmission electron microscopy, intracellular microelectrode recording and dye filling for quantitative morphometry were used to define the neurophysiology, histochemistry, and ultrastructure of these cells across species. The densely packed, smaller ICNs of mouse lacked dendrites, formed axosomatic connections, and had high synaptic efficacy constituting an obligatory synapse. At Pig ICNs, a convergence of subthreshold cholinergic inputs onto extensive dendritic arbors supported greater summation and integration of synaptic input. Human ICNs were tonically firing, with synaptic stimulation evoking large suprathreshold excitatory postsynaptic potentials like mouse, and subthreshold potentials like pig. Ultrastructural examination of synaptic terminals revealed conserved architecture, yet small clear vesicles (SCVs) were larger in pigs and humans. The presence and localization of ganglionic neuropeptides was distinct, with abundant VIP observed in human but not pig or mouse ganglia, and little SP or CGRP in pig ganglia. Action potential waveforms were similar, but human ICNs had larger after-hyperpolarizations. Intrinsic excitability differed; 93% of human cells were tonic, all pig neurons were phasic, and both phasic and tonic phenotypes were observed in mouse. In combination, this publicly accessible, multimodal atlas of ICNs from mice, pigs, and humans identifies similarities and differences in the evolution of ICNs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 24
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Molecular and functional characterization of the mouse intracardiac nervous system
G. Lizot, C. Pasqualin, … A. Chatelier·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2021
- Two Specialized Intrinsic Cardiac Neuron Types Safeguard Heart Homeostasis and Stress Resilience
Qian J. Xu, Marissa C. Applegate, … Rui B. Chang·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2025
- 3D single cell scale anatomical map of sex-dependent variability of the rat intrinsic cardiac nervous system
Clara Leung, Shaina Robbins, … James S. Schwaber·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2021
- Innervation and Neuronal Control of the Mammalian Sinoatrial Node: A Comprehensive Atlas
Peter Hanna, Michael J. Dacey, … Kalyanam Shivkumar·Circulation ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2021
- Impact of neurons on patient derived-cardiomyocytes using organ-on-a-chip and iPSC biotechnologies
A. A. Bernardin, S. Colombani, … A. C. Meli·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2022
- Identification of TREK channels in mouse intracardiac ganglion neurons
Ana Campos-Ríos, Salvador Herrera-Pérez, … José Antonio Lamas·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2025