Sign in
Evolutionary BiologyThe American Naturalist
Peer-reviewed journal article

No evidence for paternal age effects on sons or daughters, when accounting for paternal sperm storage

Krish SanghviiD, Samuel J. L. GascoigneiD, Biliana TodorovaiD, Regina Vega‐TrejoiD, Tommaso PizzariiD, Irem SepiliD

Abstract

O_LIThe age at which a father reproduces is predicted to affect not only his own fertility but also the fitness of his offspring. Specifically, offspring born to old fathers are assumed to be of a lower quality than those conceived by young fathers. However, when fathers have low mating rates, paternal age might be confounded with the duration for which mature sperm are stored in fathers prior to ejaculation. C_LIO_LIStudies that disentangle the confounding effects of paternal sperm storage duration from those of paternal age, on offspring, are lacking. We use Drosophila melanogaster to test the separate and interactive effects of paternal age and sperm storage duration (sexual rest) on the survival and lifetime reproduction of offspring. C_LIO_LIAs expected, old fathers produce fewer offspring than young fathers. But surprisingly, paternal age does not influence the survival or lifetime reproductive success of either sons or daughters. Instead, sons conceived by fathers with long durations of sexual rest have lower reproductive success than sons conceived by fathers with short durations of sexual rest. C_LIO_LIWe further discover that daughters of low reproductive quality selectively disappear with age, but sons do not, highlighting that demographic processes need to be accounted for when studying paternal age effects. C_LIO_LIOverall, our study suggests that paternal age effects might not be as pervasive as previously assumed. We emphasize that a more nuanced understanding of the mechanisms causing paternal age effects is required, so that studies do not misattribute effects of paternal sperm storage to age. C_LI

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSanghvi '23Sanghvi '24Arslan '17Dasgupta '18Travers '21Perret '22
88% semantic matchEvolutionary Biology
K. Sanghvi, T. Pizzari, I. Sepil·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2023