Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Machine learning Classification of Dyslexic Children based on EEG Local Network Features

Zahra RezvaniiD, Marzieh ZareiD, Gojko Žarić, Milene L. BonteiD, Jurgen TijmsiD, Maurits W. van der Molen, Gorka Fraga GonzáleziD

Abstract

Machine learning can be used to find meaningful patterns characterizing individual differences. Deploying a machine learning classifier fed by local features derived from graph analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) data, we aimed at designing a neurobiologically-based classifier to differentiate two groups of children, one group with and the other group without dyslexia, in a robust way. We used EEG resting-state data of 29 dyslexics and 15 typical readers in grade 3, and calculated weighted connectivity matrices for multiple frequency bands using the phase lag index (PLI). From the connectivity matrices, we derived weighted connectivity graphs. A number of local network measures were computed from those graphs, and 37 False Discovery Rate (FDR) corrected features were selected as input to a Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a common K Nearest Neighbors (KNN) classifier. Cross validation was employed to assess the machine-learning performance and random shuffling to assure the performance appropriateness of the classifier and avoid features overfitting. The best performance was for the SVM using a polynomial kernel. Children were classified with 95% accuracy based on local network features from different frequency bands. The automatic classification techniques applied to EEG graph measures showed to be both robust and reliable in distinguishing between typical and dyslexic readers.

PDFDOI
Structured summary ↓

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Abstract summary

Verified abstract synthesis

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract

Local graph measures from resting-state EEG separated dyslexic from typically reading grade-3 children with 95% accuracy using a polynomial-kernel support vector machine.

Machine learning can pick out patterns that characterise individual differences, and the authors set out to build a neurobiologically based classifier for dyslexia. They ask whether local network measures taken from resting-state EEG connectivity graphs separate children with and without dyslexia robustly.

Key results

  1. SuggestedA classifier trained on local network measures of resting-state EEG connectivity assigned individual children to the dyslexic or typical-reader group at high accuracy.

    95% accuracy reported with cross-validation on EEG from 29 children with dyslexia and 15 typical readers in grade 3, using 37 features retained after false discovery rate correction. · Abstract

  2. SuggestedAmong the classifiers tried, a support vector machine with a polynomial kernel gave the best result, ahead of the k-nearest-neighbours alternative.

    Reported as the best-performing configuration; no accuracy value is given for the k-nearest-neighbours classifier or for other kernels in this text. · Abstract

  3. ClaimedThe discriminative features were spread over several frequency bands rather than confined to one, with random shuffling used as a check against overfitting to the selected features.

    Classification is attributed to local network features from different frequency bands; no per-band accuracies, feature rankings or shuffled-label results are quoted in this text. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

Resting-state EEG was turned into weighted connectivity matrices per frequency band with the phase lag index, local network measures were computed from the resulting weighted graphs, 37 features surviving false discovery rate correction were fed to support vector machine and k-nearest-neighbours classifiers, and performance was estimated by cross-validation with random shuffling as a control.

  • Resting-state EEG recordings from grade 3 children, dyslexic readers and typical readers · human · n = 29 dyslexic, 15 typical readers
Methods & tools
phase lag index (PLI), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbours (KNN), EEG
Limitations (2)
  • The sample is small and unbalanced (29 versus 15 children from a single cohort), so a cross-validated 95% accuracy is a fragile estimate with no external validation set. · noted in this summary
  • Feature selection by false discovery rate correction is described as preceding classification; whether it was repeated inside each cross-validation fold is not stated, which determines how much selection bias enters the accuracy. · noted in this summary

Who should read:Read this if you build EEG connectivity features into individual-level classifiers, or judge machine-learning claims about neurodevelopmental group discrimination in small cohorts.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISYang '25Araújo '22Aguilar '25Araújo '22Daryakenari '26Morakabati '26
73% semantic matchNeuroscience
Yaqi Yang, Zhaoyu Liu, Brian W. L. Wong+5 more·Biological Psychology·Sep 27, 2025· 1 citations