Life Science AllianceSystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Co-existing feedback loops generate tissue-specific circadian rhythms
J. Patrick PettiD, Matthew R. Kondoff, Grigory Bordyugov, Achim KrameriD, Hanspeter HerzeliD
Abstract
Gene regulatory feedback loops generate autonomous circadian rhythms in mammalian tissues. The well-studied core clock network contains many negative and positive regulations. Multiple feedback loops have been discussed as primary rhythm generators but the design principles of the core clock and differences between tissues are still under debate.\n\nHere we use global optimization techniques to fit mathematical models to circadian gene expression profiles for different mammalian tissues. It turns out that for every investigated tissue multiple model parameter sets reproduce the experimental data. We extract for all model versions the most essential feedback loops and find auto-inhibitions of Period and Cryptochrome genes, Bmal1/Rev-erb- loops, and repressilator motifs as possible rhythm generators. Interestingly, the essential feedback loops differ between tissues, pointing to specific design principles within the hierarchy of mammalian tissue clocks. Self-inhibitions of Per and Cry genes are characteristic for models of SCN clocks, while in liver models many loops act in synergy and are connected by a repressilator motif. Tissue-specific use of a network of co-existing synergistic feedback loops could account for functional differences between organs.
- organism: mouse
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 62
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deciphering the Dynamics of Interlocked Feedback Loops in a Model of the Mammalian Circadian Clock
Dorjsuren Battogtokh, John J. Tyson·Biophysical JournalPeer-reviewed·Oct 11, 2018
- Weak Coupling Between Intracellular Feedback Loops Explains Dissociation of Clock Gene Dynamics
Christoph Schmal, Daisuke Ono, … Isao T. Tokuda·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2019
- Transcription factor activity rhythms and tissue-specific chromatin interactions explain circadian gene expression across organs.
Jake Yeung, Jérôme Mermet, … Félix Naef·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2018
- A minimal activator-inhibitor-repressor model of the hepatic circadian clock
Pauline Delpierre, Marc Lefranc·Biophysical JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 19, 2026
- Mathematical Analysis of Robustness of Oscillations in Models of the Mammalian Circadian Clock
Benjamin Heidebrecht, Jing Chen, John J. Tyson·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2020
- Nuclear receptor HNF4A trans-represses CLOCK:BMAL1 and acts as a core component of tissue-specific circadian networks
Meng Qu, Tomas Duffy, … Steve A. Kay·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2018