bioRxivCancer Biology
Machine learning enables detection of early-stage colorectal cancer by whole-genome sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA
N. Wan, D. Weinberg, T.-y. Liu, K. Niehaus, D. Delubac, A. Kannan, B. White, E. Ariazi, M. Bailey, M. Bertin, N. Boley, D. Bowen, J. Cregg, A. Drake, R. Ennis, S. Fransen, E. Gafni, L. Hansen, Y. Liu, G. L. Otte, J. Pecson, B. Rice, G. E. Sanderson, A. Sharma, J. St. John, , I. S. Haque
Abstract
BackgroundBlood-based methods using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are under development as an alternative to existing screening tests. However, early-stage detection of cancer using tumor-derived cfDNA has proven challenging because of the small proportion of cfDNA derived from tumor tissue in early-stage disease. A machine learning approach to discover signatures in cfDNA, potentially reflective of both tumor and non-tumor contributions, may represent a promising direction for the early detection of cancer.\n\nMethodsWhole-genome sequencing was performed on cfDNA extracted from plasma samples (N=546 colorectal cancer and 271 non-cancer controls). Reads aligning to protein-coding gene bodies were extracted, and read counts were normalized. cfDNA tumor fraction was estimated using IchorCNA. Machine learning models were trained using k-fold cross-validation and confounder-based cross-validation to assess generalization performance.\n\nResultsIn a colorectal cancer cohort heavily weighted towards early-stage cancer (80% stage I/II), we achieved a mean AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.91-0.93) with a mean sensitivity of 85% (95% CI 83-86%) at 85% specificity. Sensitivity generally increased with tumor stage and increasing tumor fraction. Stratification by age, sequencing batch, and institution demonstrated the impact of these confounders and provided a more accurate assessment of generalization performance.\n\nConclusionsA machine learning approach using cfDNA achieved high sensitivity and specificity in a large, predominantly early-stage, colorectal cancer cohort. The possibility of systematic technical and institution-specific biases warrants similar confounder analyses in other studies. Prospective validation of this machine learning method and evaluation of a multi-analyte approach are underway.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pan-cancer detection and typing by mining patterns in large genome-wide cell-free DNA sequencing datasets
Huiwen Che, Tatjana Jatsenko, … Joris Robert Vermeesch·Clinical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2022
- Error-corrected deep targeted sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA from colorectal cancer patients for sensitive detection of circulating tumor DNA
A. Frydendahl, M. H. Rasmussen, … C. L. Andersen·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2023
- Circulating bacterial DNA as a tool towards non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer and adenoma
- Machine learning identifies cell-free DNA 5-hydroxymethylation biomarkers that detect occult colorectal cancer in PLCO Screening Trial subjects
Diana C. West-Szymanski, Zhou Zhang, … Wei Zhang·bioRxiv·Feb 25, 2024
- Single- and double-strand circulating DNA fragmentomics for enhanced cancer detection performance
Ekaterina Pisareva, Marianne Richaud, … Alain Roger Thierry·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2025
- Challenges in Using ctDNA to Achieve Early Detection of Cancer
Imran S Haque, Olivier Elemento·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2017