Conserved Residues in the Gα interface show subtype specificity in Gβγ coupling
Wenyuan WeiiD, H. Dalton Taylor, Ning MaiD, Andréi S. RodiniD, Sergio BranciamoreiD, Henrik Gunnar DohlmaniD, Nagarajan VaidehiiD
Abstract
Although the structural basis of selective G-protein coupling to G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is well characterized, the mechanisms underlying selective interactions between distinct G subtypes (Gs, Gi, Gq, and G12/13) and G{beta}{gamma} remain poorly understood. While conserved residues in G subtypes are often assumed to have similar functions, they may instead modulate coupling selectivity by altering the frequency and stability of contacts at the G:G{beta}{gamma} interface. Using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations combined with the interpretable machine learning method, Bayesian Network Model (BNM), and protein-protein proximity (BRET) assays, we show that conserved residues in the two closely related Gi/o and Gq/11 subfamilies contribute differentially to G{beta}{gamma} coupling. These conserved residue "hotspots" on Gi and Gq produced divergent functional effects on G{beta}{gamma} coupling, indicating that conservation does not ensure functional equivalence. These findings suggest that local microenvironment and paralog-specific allosteric coupling shape how conserved interface residues contribute to protein-protein coupling. The framework provides a systematic approach for dissecting subtype-specific mechanisms, with implications for drug design and for annotating the functional relevance of disease-associated variants. The computational methods used here are broadly applicable to other homologous protein families.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Allostery between distant structural regions dictates selectivity in GPCR:G protein coupling.
Elizaveta Mukhaleva, Edgardo J. Sánchez, … Nagarajan Vaidehi·BiochemistryPeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2026
- Structure and dynamics determine G protein coupling specificity at a class A GPCR
Marina Casiraghi, Haoqing Wang, … Brian K. Kobilka·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2025
- GPCRome-wide structural analysis of G-protein-coupling selectivity
Marin Matic, Pasquale Miglionico, … Francesco Raimondi·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2022
- Allosteric pathways govern Gα protein coupling selectivity at promiscuous GPCRs
Tegvir S Boora, Hanyu Chen, … Stéphane A. Laporte·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2026
- Bayesian network models identify co-operative GPCR:G protein interactions that contribute to G protein coupling
E. Mukhaleva, N. Ma, … N. Vaidehi·bioRxiv·Oct 9, 2023
- Evolutionary association of receptor-wide amino acids with G protein coupling selectivity in aminergic GPCRs
B. Selcuk, I. Erol, … O. Adebali·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2021