bioRxivCancer BiologyPreprint
Combined agonism and antagonism of canonical and non-canonical progesterone receptors in triple-negative breast cancer cells potentiates cytotoxicity enhanced by PI3K inhibition
Paula E. PetrellaiD, Jason W. CheniD, Benjamin D. CosgroveiD
Abstract
Confounding the treatment options available to patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are not only its purported lack of hormone receptor and growth factor receptor targets (ER-/ PR-/ HER2-), but its enrichment in plastic and chemoresistant breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs). Although descriptions of non-canonical PR expression in TNBC are rife in the literature, only canonical PR is considered in the definition of TNBC and is used to determine therapeutic strategy, not least because the utility of non-canonical PR modulation in TNBC chemoresistance is largely unexplored and poorly understood. Here we document the expression of three non-canonical PRs and the canonical PR (PGR) phosphorylated at Ser345 (p-PGR S345) in a panel of TNBC and luminal breast cancer cell lines, and employ combined PR agonists and antagonists to investigate the influence of PR activity on TNBC cell viability and PI3K inhibitor cytotoxicity. To examine the contributions of non-canonical membrane-associated PRs mPR{beta} and PGRMC1, we tested the agonist Org OD 02-0, a synthetic progestin targeted to mPRs; the PGRMC1 antagonist Ag-205; and the antagonist SPA70 against the cytosolic/nuclear PXR, in the background of pan-PI3K inhibition with Buparlisib (BUP). We also reveal that combinations of agonists and antagonists targeted to canonical and non-canonical PRs robustly potentiate the cytotoxic effects of PI3K inhibition, and also exhibit significant cytotoxicity on their own. Using functional assays, flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry and protein expression analyses, we found that simultaneously perturbing PRs and inhibiting PI3K function resulted in significantly greater cell death than vehicle control or BUP alone, and reduced the proportion of ALDH1+ BCSCs in two TNBC cell lines. We conclude that four types of PR are tractable targets in TNBC which participate in cell viability and enhance chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity, and should be re-evaluated in an evolving definition of this challenging disease.
- organism: human
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: cancer & tumor microenvironment
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Chemoresistance to additive PARP/PI3K dual inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines is associated with adaptive stem cell-like prevalence
Paula E. Petrella, Jason W. Chen, … Benjamin D. Cosgrove·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2024
- On the therapeutic potential of MAPK4 in triple-negative breast cancer
F. Boudghene-Stambouli, M. Soulez, … S. Meloche·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2022
- Cholesterol biosynthesis inhibition synergizes with AKT inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer
A. Toker, A. L. Hillis, … R. R. Madsen·bioRxiv·Jan 16, 2024
- Global kinome silencing combined with 3D invasion screening of the tumor microenvironment identifies fibroblast-expressed PIK3Cδ involvement in triple-negative breast cancer progression
T. Gagliano, K. Shah, … G. Giamas·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2019
- MYBL2 maintains stemness and promotes theta-mediated end joining in triple negative breast cancer
Rachel Bayley, Anna Munsey, … Paloma García·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2025
- Augmentation of extracellular ATP synergizes with chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer
J. M. Manouchehri, J. Datta, … M. A. Cherian·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2022