Nature CommunicationsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Estimating direct and indirect genetic effects on offspring phenotypes using genome-wide summary results data: a comparison of multivariate methods
Nicole M. WarringtoniD, Liang‐Dar HwangiD, Michel Guillaume NivardiD, David M. EvansiD
Abstract
Estimation of the direct genetic effect of an individuals own genotype on their phenotype, independent of any contaminating indirect parental genetic effects is becoming increasingly important. These conditional estimates are of interest in their own right, but are also useful for downstream analyses such as intergenerational Mendelian randomization. We compare several available multivariate methods that utilize summary results statistics from genome-wide association studies to determine how well they estimate conditional direct and indirect genetic effects, while accounting for sample overlap. Using robustly associated birth weight variants and data from the UK Biobank, we contrasted the point estimates and their standard errors at each of the individual loci compared to those obtained using individual level genotype data, in addition to comparing the computational time, inflation of the test statistics and number of genome-wide significant SNPs identified by each of the methods. We show that Genomic SEM outperforms the other methods in accurately estimating conditional genetic effects and their standard errors. We subsequently applied Genomic SEM to fertility data in the UK Biobank and partitioned the genetic effect into female and male fertility in addition to a sibling specific effect. This analysis identified one novel locus for fertility and replicated seven previously identified loci. We also identified genetic correlations between fertility and educational attainment, risk taking behaviour, autism and subjective well-being. We therefore recommend Genomic SEM to be used to partition genetic effects across the genome into direct and indirect components.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- research focus: fine-mapping
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 32
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Field percentile
- top 10%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mendelian imputation of parental genotypes for genome-wide estimation of direct and indirect genetic effects
Alexander I. Young, Seyed Moeen Nehzati, … Augustine Kong·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022
- Estimating genetic nurture with summary statistics of multi-generational genome-wide association studies
Yuchang Wu, Xiaoyuan Zhong, … Qiongshi Lu·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2021
- Within-sibship GWAS improve estimates of direct genetic effects
Laurence J Howe, Michel Guillaume Nivard, … Neil M Davies·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2021
- Using Structural Equation Modeling to Jointly Estimate Maternal and Foetal Effects on Birthweight in the UK Biobank
Nicole M. Warrington, Rachel M. Freathy, … David M. Evans·International Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2018
- Estimation of indirect genetic effects and heritability under assortative mating
Alexander I. Young·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2023
- Interpreting population and family-based genome-wide association studies in the presence of confounding
Carl Veller, Graham Coop·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 11, 2024