henhaobio
Sign in

Briefings in BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Revolutionizing GPCR-Ligand Predictions: DeepGPCR with experimental Validation for High-Precision Drug Discovery

Haiping ZhangiD, Hongjie FaniD, Jixia WangiD, Tao HouiD, Konda Mani SaravananiD, Wei XiaiD, Hei Wun KaniD, Junxin LiiD, John Z. H. ZhangiD, Xinmiao Liang, Yang CheniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), crucial in various diseases, are targeted of over 40% of approved drugs. However, the reliable acquisition of experimental GPCRs structures is hindered by their lipid-embedded conformations. Traditional protein-ligand interaction models falter in GPCR-drug interactions, caused by limited and low-quality structures. Generalized models, trained on soluble protein-ligand pairs, are also inadequate. To address these issues, we developed two models, DeepGPCR_BC for binary classification and DeepGPCR_RG for affinity prediction. These models use non-structural GPCR-ligand interaction data, leveraging graph convolutional networks (GCN) and mol2vec techniques to represent binding pockets and ligands as graphs. This approach significantly speeds up predictions while preserving critical physical-chemical and spatial information. In independent tests, DeepGPCR_BC surpassed Autodock Vina and Schrodinger Dock with an AUC of 0.72, accuracy of 0.68, and TPR of 0.73, whereas DeepGPCR_RG demonstrated a Pearson correlation of 0.39 and RMSE of 1.34. We applied these models to screen drug candidates for GPR35 (Q9HC97), yielding promising results with 3 (F545-1970, K297-0698, S948-0241) out of 8 candidates. Furthermore, we also successfully obtained 6 active inhibitors for GLP-1R. Our GPCR-specific models pave the way for efficient and accurate large-scale virtual screening, potentially revolutionizing drug discovery in the GPCR field.

Citations
25
FWCI
5.29
Field percentile
top 3%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISProvasi '26Yu '24Provasi '25Lim '18Sakuma '26Ferguson '26
71% semantic matchBioinformatics
Davide Provasi, Kirill A. Konovalov, Nicholas Riina+2 more·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling·Jan 14, 2026· 1 citations