Sign in
NeuroscienceDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

Cortical Latency Predicts Reading Fluency from Late Childhood to Early Adolescence

Fang WangiD, Quynh Trang H. Nguyen, Blair KaneshiroiD, Anthony M. NorciaiD, Bruce D. McCandlissiD

Abstract

The development of fluent literacy skills from childhood to adolescence is strongly constrained by the temporal dynamics of word recognition. Capturing the neural basis of these subtle timing changes in word recognition has remained challenging with EEG measures that lack reliability at the individual subject level. Here, we leverage phase information from Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEPs) to derive precise and reliable temporal dynamics of neural signatures underlying visual word form recognition at the individual level and examine their relationship to reading fluency and comprehension. Typically developing readers (N = 68), aged 8-15 years, viewed a stream of four-character stimulus strings presented at 3 Hz. Significant SSVEP signals emerged for nearly all participants. Signals at 3, 6, and 9 Hz harmonics exhibited a phase pattern consistent with a delay model, indicating a mean latency of approximately 170 milliseconds. Individual variations in latencies demonstrated (a) high internal consistency (R = .94); (b) stability across variations in letter string forms (familiar words, nonwords with familiar letters, nonwords with unfamiliar pseudo-characters); (c) a linear relationship with age; and most remarkably, (d) a predictive relationship with individual variation in reading fluency and reading comprehension. These results establish SSVEP visual word form latency as a promising approach for investigating the neural basis of reading development, paving the way for future translational applications in education and offering potential solutions to broader societal challenges in promoting population-level reading fluency.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
2
FWCI
3.96
Field percentile
top 6%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWang '21Wang '22Wang '21Barnes '20Ozernov‐Pal '22Caffarra '21
79% semantic matchNeuroscience
Fang Wang, Quynh Trang H. Nguyen, Blair Kaneshiro+5 more·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2021