BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Idefix: identifying accidental sample mix-ups in biobanks using polygenic scores
Robert WarmerdamiD, Pauline LantingiD, Lifelines Cohort Study, Patrick DeeleniD, Lude FrankeiD
Abstract
Structured abstractIdentifying sample mix-ups in biobanks is essential to allow the repurposing of genetic data for clinical pharmacogenetics. Pharmacogenetic advice based on the genetic information of another individual is potentially harmful. Existing methods for identifying mix-ups are limited to datasets in which additional omics data (e.g. gene expression) is available. Cohorts lacking such data can only use sex, which can reveal only half of the mix-ups. Here, we describe Idefix, a method for the identification of accidental sample mix-ups in biobanks using polygenic scores. In the Lifelines population-based biobank we calculated polygenic scores (PGSs) for 25 traits for 32,786 participants. Idefix then compares the actual phenotypes to PGSs and uses the relative discordance that is expected for mix-ups, compared to correct samples. In a simulation, using induced mix-ups, Idefix reaches an AUC of 0.90 using 25 polygenic scores and sex. This is a substantial improvement over using only sex, which has an AUC of 0.75. Idefix therefore is not yet able to identify every sample mix-up. However, this will likely improve soon, with highly powered GWAS summary statistics that will likely become available for more commonly measured traits. Nevertheless, Idefix can already be used to identify a high-quality set of participants for whom it is very unlikely that they reflect sample mix-ups, and therefore could be offered a pharmacogenetic passport. For instance, when selecting the 10% of participants for whom predicted phenotypes adhere best to the actually measured phenotypes, we estimate that the proportion of sample mix-ups is reduced 250-fold. Availability and implementationIdefix is freely available at https://github.com/molgenis/systemsgenetics/wiki/Idefix Contactl.h.franke@umcg.nl
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.42
- Field percentile
- top 41%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Litmus Test for Confounding in Polygenic Scores
Samuel Pattillo Smith, Olivia S. Smith, … Arbel Harpak·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2025
- Assessing digital phenotyping to enhance genetic studies of human diseases
Christopher DeBoever, Yosuke Tanigawa, … Manuel A. Rivas·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 9, 2020
- Locus-specific gene-context interactions improve polygenic prediction
Renée Fonseca, Christa Caggiano, … Andy Dahl·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026
- Publicly Available Privacy-preserving Benchmarks for Polygenic Prediction
Menno J. Witteveen, Emil M. Pedersen, … Bjarni Jóhann Vilhjálmsson·bioRxiv·Oct 10, 2022
- An Updated Polygenic Index Repository: Expanded Phenotypes, New Cohorts, and Improved Causal Inference
Robel G. Alemu, Anastasia Terskaya, … Aysu Okbay·bioRxiv·May 14, 2025
- Polygenic scores for UK Biobank scale data
Timothy Shin Heng Mak, Robert M. Porsch, … Pak Chung Sham·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2018