PLoS ONEPharmacology & ToxicologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Evaluation of subretinally delivered Cas9 ribonucleoproteins in murine and porcine animal models highlights key considerations for therapeutic translation of genetic medicines
Spencer C. WeiiD, Aaron J. CantoriD, Jack Walleshauser, Rina J. Mepani, Kory Melton, Ashil Bans, Prachi Khekare, Suhani Gupta, Jonathan WangiD, Craig Soares, Radwan Kiwan, J.L. LeeiD, Shannon McCawleyiD, Vihasi Jani, Weng In Leong, Pawan Kumar ShahiiD, Jean Chan, Pierre Boivin, Peter B. OtoupaliD, Bikash Ranjan PattnaikiD, David M. GammiD, Krishanu SahaiD, Benjamin G. GoweniD, Mary Haak‐Frendscho, Mary J. Janatpour, Adam P. SilvermaniD
Abstract
Genetic medicines, including CRISPR/Cas technologies, extend tremendous promise for addressing unmet medical need in inherited retinal disorders and other indications; however, there remain challenges for the development of therapeutics. Herein, we evaluate genome editing by engineered Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (eRNP) in vivo via subretinal administration using mouse and pig animal models. Subretinal administration of adenine base editor and double strand break-inducing Cas9 nuclease eRNPs mediate genome editing in both species. Editing occurs in retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptor cells, with favorable tolerability in both species. Using transgenic reporter strains, we determine that editing primarily occurs close to the site of administration, within the bleb region associated with subretinal injection. Our results show that subretinal administration of eRNPs in mice mediates base editing of up to 12% of the total neural retina, with an average rate of 7% observed at the highest dose tested. In contrast, a substantially lower editing efficiency was observed in minipigs; even with direct quantification of only the treated region, a maximum base editing rate of 1.5%, with an average rate of <1%, was observed. Our data highlight the importance of species consideration in translational studies for genetic medicines targeting the eye and provide an example of a lack of translation between small and larger animal models in the context of subretinal administration of Cas9 eRNPs.
- organism: mouse
- organism: plant (other)
- assay: CRISPR screen
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Field percentile
- top 30%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Direct delivery of Cas9 or base editor protein and guide RNA complex enables genome editing in the retina
C. Botto, J. Pulman, … D. Dalkara·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2023
- Retinal organoids mirror CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing efficiency observed in vivo
Juliette Pulman, Hugo Malki, … Deniz Dalkara·Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2025
- Gene editing preserves visual function in a mouse model of retinal degeneration
Paola Vagni, Laura E. Perlini, … Diego Ghezzi·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 10, 2019
- Comparison of CRISPR/Cas endonucleases for in vivo retinal gene editing.
F. Li, K. Wing, … A. W. Hewitt·bioRxiv·Jun 9, 2020
- Genome editing in the mouse brain with minimally immunogenic Cas9 RNPs
E. C. Stahl, J. K. Sabo, … J. A. Doudna·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2023
- AAV-delivered CRISPR-Cas9 elicits persistent retinal immune responses compared with transient responses to RNP
Juliette Pulman, Duohao Ren, … Sylvain Fisson·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2025