Sign in
GenomicsbioRxiv
Preprint

Final amendment: A plausible explanation for in silico reporting of erroneous MET gene expression in tumor-educated platelets (TEP) intended for "liquid biopsy" of non-small cell lung carcinoma still refutes the TEP-study

Sandeep ChakrabortyiD

Abstract

Final amendment noteThis paper had proposed a plausible way for detecting large quantities of MET, which the authors have clarified was not done :the possible explanation proposed for this erroneous MET gene expression does bypass the filtering step we perform in the data processing pipeline, i.e. selection of intron-spanning reads, as can be read in the main text\" comments in http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/07/02/146134, where a continuing critique of the TEP study continues. Please consider this pre-print closed.\n\nOriginal abstractThe reported over-expression of MET genes in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) from an analysis of the RNA-seq data from tumor-educated platelets (TEP), intended to supplement existing liquid biopsy techniques [1], has been refuted recently (http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/06/05/146134, not peer-reviewed). The MET proto-oncogene (Accid:NG 008996.1, RefSeqGene LRG 662 on chromosome 7, METwithintrons) encodes 21 exons resulting in a 6710 bps MET gene (Accid: NM 001127500.2, METonlyexons). METwithintrons has multiple matches in the RNA-seq derived reads of lung cancer samples (for example: SRR1982756.11853382). Unfortunately, these are non-specific sequences in the intronic regions, matching to multiple genes on different chromosomes with 100% identity (KIF6 on chr6, COL6A6 on chr3, MYO16 on chr13, etc. for SRR1982756.11853382). In contrast, METonlyexons has few matches in the reads, if at all [2]. However, even RNA-seq from healthy donors have similar matches for METwithintrons so the computation behind the over-expression statistic remains obscure, even if METwithintrons was used as the search gene. In summary, this work re-iterates the lack of reproducibility in the bioinformatic analysis that establishes TEP as a possible source for \"liquid biopsy\".

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISChakraborty '17Chakraborty '17Minne '26Kent '26Castenmille '22Vadla '21
72% semantic matchCancer Biology
Sandeep Chakraborty·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2017