Final amendment: A plausible explanation for in silico reporting of erroneous MET gene expression in tumor-educated platelets (TEP) intended for "liquid biopsy" of non-small cell lung carcinoma still refutes the TEP-study
Abstract
Final amendment noteThis paper had proposed a plausible way for detecting large quantities of MET, which the authors have clarified was not done :the possible explanation proposed for this erroneous MET gene expression does bypass the filtering step we perform in the data processing pipeline, i.e. selection of intron-spanning reads, as can be read in the main text\" comments in http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/07/02/146134, where a continuing critique of the TEP study continues. Please consider this pre-print closed.\n\nOriginal abstractThe reported over-expression of MET genes in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) from an analysis of the RNA-seq data from tumor-educated platelets (TEP), intended to supplement existing liquid biopsy techniques [1], has been refuted recently (http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/06/05/146134, not peer-reviewed). The MET proto-oncogene (Accid:NG 008996.1, RefSeqGene LRG 662 on chromosome 7, METwithintrons) encodes 21 exons resulting in a 6710 bps MET gene (Accid: NM 001127500.2, METonlyexons). METwithintrons has multiple matches in the RNA-seq derived reads of lung cancer samples (for example: SRR1982756.11853382). Unfortunately, these are non-specific sequences in the intronic regions, matching to multiple genes on different chromosomes with 100% identity (KIF6 on chr6, COL6A6 on chr3, MYO16 on chr13, etc. for SRR1982756.11853382). In contrast, METonlyexons has few matches in the reads, if at all [2]. However, even RNA-seq from healthy donors have similar matches for METwithintrons so the computation behind the over-expression statistic remains obscure, even if METwithintrons was used as the search gene. In summary, this work re-iterates the lack of reproducibility in the bioinformatic analysis that establishes TEP as a possible source for \"liquid biopsy\".
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- No supporting evidence of classification based on FFPE samples, ambiguity in classification of EGFR mutants, and inclusion of bona-fide platelet genes in discriminator sets indicate no biological basis for using RNA-seq from tumor-educated platelets as a source in "liquid biopsy"
Sandeep Chakraborty·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2017
- Final amendment: Ambiguous specification of EGFR mutations compounded by nil or negligible fragmented gene counts and erroneous application of the Kappa statistic reiterates doubts on the veracity of the TEP-study
Sandeep Chakraborty·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2017
- A MET-Targeted Variable New Antigen Receptor Theranostic for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Rachel L. Minne, Jayden L. West, … Aaron Matthew LeBeau·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2026
- Intraoperative arteriovenous patient sampling to assess in situ non-small cell lung cancer metabolism
Johnathan R. Kent, Keene L. Abbott, … Peggy P. Hsu·Journal of Clinical InvestigationPeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2026
- Effective generation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte products from metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions irrespective of location and previous treatments.
S. M. Castenmiller, R. de Groot, … M. C. Wolkers·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2022
- Combining Plasma Extracellular Vesicle Let-7b-5p, miR-184 and Circulating miR-22-3p Levels for NSCLC Diagnosis and Drug Resistance Prediction
G. P. Vadla, B. Dhagat, … C. Y. Chabu·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2021