bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint
The genetic architecture of the human bZIP family
Alexandra M. BendeliD, Bastian Eichenbergers, Georg KempfiD, Dominique Klein, K. Shimada, M. Franco, S.H.W. KraatziD, Sevi DurduiD, Vivian Herrmann, Grégory RothiD, Charlotte SonesoniD, Sébastien A. SmallwoodiD, Nicolas H Thomae, Dirk SchübeleriD, Michael Beda StadleriD, Friedemann ZenkeiD, Guillaume DissiD
Abstract
Generative biology holds the promise to transform our ability to design and understand living systems by creating novel proteins, pathways, and organisms with tailored functions that address challenges in medicine, sustainability, and technology. However, training generative models requires large quantities of data that captures the genetic architecture of protein function in all its complexity, but these are currently scarce. Here, we systematically mutagenized all 54 human basic-leucine zipper (bZIP) domains and quantified their interactions with each other using bindingPCA, a quantitative deep mutational scanning assay. This resulted in [~]2 million interaction measurements, capturing the effect of all single amino acid substitutions at each of the 35 interfacial positions. We found that mutation effects are largely additive in the vicinity of each wild-type bZIPs, but diverge across the family, indicating strong context dependency. A global additive thermodynamic model provided moderate prediction of mutation effects, while individual models per bZIP achieved higher performance, supporting a model of local simplicity and global complexity. Our results therefore suggest that the genetic architecture of protein function is more complex than previously anticipated, which could hinder predictability. However, a convolutional neural network trained on this dataset could accurately predict binding scores from sequence alone. Furthermore, the model enabled the design of synthetic bZIPs with high target specificity, demonstrating practical applicability for bioengineering purposes. Our study shows that capturing family-wide diversity is essential to reveal context dependencies and train accurate quantitative models of protein-protein interactions.
- organism: human
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: protein folding & dynamics
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The genetic architecture of protein stability
A. J. Faure, A. Marti-Aranda, … B. Lehner·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2023
- The genetic architecture of protein interaction affinity and specificity
Alexandra M. Bendel, André J. Faure, … Guillaume Diss·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2024
- ProBASS: a language model with sequence and structural features for predicting the effect of mutations on binding affinity
Sagara N.S. Gurusinghe, Yibing Wu, … Julia M. Shifman·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- Deep generative models of genetic variation capture mutation effects
Adam J. Riesselman, John Ingraham, Debora S. Marks·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2018
- ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Design and Fitness Prediction
Pascal Notin, Aaron W. Kollasch, … Debora S. Marks·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2023
- BoltzGen: Toward Universal Binder Design
Hannes Stark, Felix Faltings, … Tommi Jaakkola·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2025