The genetic architecture of protein interaction affinity and specificity
Alexandra M. BendeliD, André J. FaureiD, Dominique Klein, Kenji ShimadaiD, Romane Lyautey, Nicole Schiffelholz, Georg KempfiD, Simone CavadiniiD, Ben LehneriD, Guillaume DissiD
Abstract
Proteins function in crowded cellular environments in which they must bind to specific target proteins but also avoid binding to many other off-target proteins. In large protein families this task is particularly challenging because many off-target proteins have very similar structures. How this specificity of physical protein-protein interactions in cellular networks is encoded and evolves is not very well understood. Here we address the question of specificity-encoding by comprehensively quantifying the effects of all mutations in one protein, JUN, on its binding to all other members of a protein family, the 54 human basic leucine zipper transcription factors. Fitting a global thermodynamic model to the data reveals that most affinity changing mutations equally affect JUNs propensity to bind to all its interaction partners. Mutations that alter the specificity of binding are much rarer. These specificity-altering mutations are, however, distributed throughout the JUN interaction interface. JUNs interaction specificity is encoded by both positive determinants that promote on-target interactions and negative determinants that prevent off-target interactions. Indeed, about half of the specificity-defining residues in JUN have dual functions and both promote on-target binding and prevent off-target binding. Whereas nearly all mutations that alter specificity are pleiotropic and also alter the affinity of binding to all interaction partners, the converse is not true with mutations outside of the interface able to tune affinity without affecting specificity. Our results provide the first global view of how mutations in a protein affect binding to all its potential interaction partners and reveal the distributed encoding of specificity and affinity in an interaction interface. They also show how the modular architecture of coiled-coils provides an elegant solution to the challenge of optimising specificity and affinity in a large protein family.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 22
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A complete map of specificity encoding enables reprogramming of a protein interaction
Taraneh Zarin, Cristina Hidalgo-Carcedo, Ben Lehner·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2024
- Climbing up and down binding landscapes: a high-throughput study of mutational effects in homologous protein-protein complexes
M. Heyne, J. Shirian, … J. M. Shifman·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2020
- General theory of specific binding: insights from a genetic, mechano-chemical protein model
J. M. McBride, J.-P. Eckmann, T. Tlusty·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2022
- Diversification of DNA-binding specificity via permissive and specificity-switching mutations in the ParB/Noc protein family
A. S. B. Jalal, N. T. Tran, … T. B. K. Le·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2020
- High-throughput binding affinity measurements for mutations spanning a transcription factor-DNA interface reveal affinity and specificity determinants
A. K. Aditham, C. J. Markin, … P. M. Fordyce·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2020
- MechPPI: Binding Mechanism-based Machine-Learning tool for Predicting Protein-Protein Binding Affinity Changes Upon Mutations
Yangying Liu, Grant A. Armstrong, … Brian Yuan Chen·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2023