Nature AgingBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
An Open Competition for Biomarkers of Aging
Kejun YingiD, Seth Paulson, Julian ReinhardiD, Jakob TräubleiD, Stefan Jokiel, Raphael LermeriD, Lucas Paulo de Lima CamilloiD, Korbinian TraeubleiD, Dane Gobel, Chiara Herzog, Matthias HeinigiD, Heribert SchunkertiD, Gabriele S. Kaminski SchierleiD, Jesse R. PoganikiD, Mahdi MoqriiD, Vadim N. GladysheviD
Abstract
Open scientific competitions have successfully driven biomedical advances but remain underutilized in aging research, where biological complexity and heterogeneity require methodological innovations. Here, we present the results from Phase I of the Biomarkers of Aging Challenge, an open competition designed to drive innovation in aging biomarker development and validation. The challenge leverages a unique DNA methylation dataset and aging outcomes from 500 individuals, aged 18 to 99. Participants are asked to develop novel models to predict chronological age, mortality, and multi-morbidity. Results from the chronological age prediction phase show important advances in biomarker accuracy and innovation compared to existing models. The winning models feature improved predictive power and employ advanced machine learning techniques, innovative data preprocessing, and the integration of biological knowledge. These approaches have led to the identification of novel age-associated methylation sites and patterns. This challenge establishes a paradigm for collaborative aging biomarker development, potentially accelerating the discovery of clinically relevant predictors of aging-related outcomes. This supports personalized medicine, clinical trial design, and the broader field of geroscience, paving the way for more targeted and effective longevity interventions.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The AccelerAge framework: A new statistical approach to predict biological age based on time-to-event data
Marije H. Sluiskes, Jelle J. Goeman, … Mar Rodríguez‐Girondo·European Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 6, 2024
- A Unified Framework for Systematic Curation and Evaluation of Aging Biomarkers
Kejun Ying, Seth Paulson, … Vadim N. Gladyshev·Nature AgingPeer-reviewed·Nov 4, 2025
- OMICmAge: An integrative multi-omics approach to quantify biological age with electronic medical records
Qingwen Chen, Varun Bhamidipati Dwaraka, … Jessica Ann Lasky-Su·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2023
- ComputAgeBench: Epigenetic Aging Clocks Benchmark
Dmitrii V. Kriukov, Evgeniy Efimov, … Dmitry V. Dylov·ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD)Peer-reviewed·Aug 3, 2025
- Improved prediction of chronological age from DNA methylation limits it as a biomarker of ageing
Qian Zhang, Costanza Ludovica Vallerga, … Peter M. Visscher·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2018
- Quantification of the pace of biological aging in humans through a blood test: The DunedinPoAm DNA methylation algorithm
Daniel W. Belsky, Avshalom Caspi, … Terrie E. Moffitt·eLifePeer-reviewed·May 5, 2020