Nature AgingBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
A Unified Framework for Systematic Curation and Evaluation of Aging Biomarkers
Kejun YingiD, Seth Paulson, Alec EamesiD, Alexander TyshkovskiyiD, Siyuan LiiD, Nir EynoniD, Macsue JacquesiD, Robin GrolauxiD, Kirsten SealeiD, Erik Jacques, Ludger J.E. GoeminneiD, Andrea CiprianoiD, Martin Felipe Perez-GuevaraiD, Mehrnoosh Emamifar, Maximiliano Casas Martínez, Dayoon KwoniD, Anna KoshelevaiD, Michael P. SnyderiD, Dane Gobel, Chiara Maria Stella HerzogiD, Daniel L. McCartneyiD, Riccardo Emilio MarioniiD, Jessica Ann Lasky-SuiD, Jesse R. PoganikiD, Mahdi MoqriiD, Vadim N. GladysheviD
Abstract
Aging biomarkers are essential for understanding and quantifying the aging process and developing targeted longevity interventions. However, validation of these tools has been hindered by the lack of standardized approaches for cross-population validation, disparate biomarker designs, and inconsistencies in dataset structures. To address these challenges, we developed Biolearn, an open-source library that provides a unified framework for the curation, harmonization, and systematic evaluation of aging biomarkers. Leveraging Biolearn, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of various aging biomarkers across multiple datasets. Our systematic approach involved three key steps: (1) harmonizing existing and novel aging biomarkers in standardized formats; (2) unifying public datasets to ensure coherent structuring and formatting; and (3) applying computational methodologies to assess the harmonized biomarkers against the unified datasets. This evaluation yielded valuable insights into the performance, robustness, and generalizability of aging biomarkers across different populations and datasets. The Biolearn python library, which forms the foundation of this systematic evaluation, is freely available at https://Bio-Learn.github.io. Our work establishes a unified framework for the curation and evaluation of aging biomarkers, paving the way for more efficient and effective clinical validation and application in the field of longevity research.
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 56
- FWCI
- 13.86
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- TranslAGE: A Comprehensive Platform for Systematic Validation of Epigenetic Aging Biomarkers
Daniel S. Borrus, Raghav Sehgal, … Albert Higgins‐Chen·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2025
- An Open Competition for Biomarkers of Aging
Kejun Ying, Seth Paulson, … Vadim N. Gladyshev·Nature AgingPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2026
- ComputAgeBench: Epigenetic Aging Clocks Benchmark
Dmitrii V. Kriukov, Evgeniy Efimov, … Dmitry V. Dylov·ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD)Peer-reviewed·Aug 3, 2025
- The AccelerAge framework: A new statistical approach to predict biological age based on time-to-event data
Marije H. Sluiskes, Jelle J. Goeman, … Mar Rodríguez‐Girondo·European Journal of EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 6, 2024
- Markers, Mechanisms and Metrics of Biological Aging: A Scoping Review
Alison Ziesel, Jennifer T. H. Reeves, … Hosna Jabbari·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2024
- Longevity Bench: Are SotA LLMs ready for aging research?
Alex A. Zhavoronkov, Denis Sidorenko, … Fedor Galkin·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2026