Which mouse multiparental population is right for your study? The Collaborative Cross inbred strains, their F1 hybrids, or the Diversity Outbred population
Abstract
Multiparental populations (MPPs) encompass greater genetic diversity than traditional experimental crosses of two inbred strains, enabling broader surveys of genetic variation underlying complex traits. Two such mouse MPPs are the Collaborative Cross (CC) inbred panel and the Diversity Outbred (DO) population, which are descended from the same eight inbred strains. Additionally, the F1 intercrosses of CC strains (CC-RIX) have been used and enable study designs with replicate outbred mice. Genetic analyses commonly used by researchers to investigate complex traits in these populations include characterizing how heritable a trait is, i.e., its heritability, and mapping its underlying genetic loci, i.e., its quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Here we evaluate the relative merits of these populations for these tasks through simulation, as well as provide recommendations for performing the quantitative genetic analyses. We find that sample populations that include replicate animals, as possible with the CC and CC-RIX, provide more efficient and precise estimates of heritability. We report QTL mapping power curves for the CC, CC-RIX, and DO across a range of QTL effect sizes and polygenic backgrounds for samples of 174 and 500 mice. The utility of replicate animals in the CC and CC-RIX for mapping QTLs rapidly decreased as traits became more polygenic. Only large sample populations of 500 DO mice were well-powered to detect smaller effect loci (7.5-10%) for highly complex traits (80% polygenic background). All results were generated with our R package musppr, which we developed to simulate data from these MPPs and evaluate genetic analyses from user-provided genotypes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Determinants of QTL mapping power in the realized Collaborative Cross
Gregory R. Keele, Wesley L. Crouse, … William S. J. Valdar·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 26, 2019
- QTLViewer: An interactive webtool for genetic analysis in the Collaborative Cross and Diversity Outbred mouse populations
Matthew J. Vincent, Isabela Gerdes Gyuricza, … Gary A. Churchill·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2022
- Testing pleiotropy vs. separate QTL in multiparental populations
Frederick J. Boehm, Elissa J. Chesler, … Karl W. Broman·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 16, 2019
- The influence of QTL allelic diversity on QTL detection in multi-parent populations: a simulation study in sugar beet
Vincent Garin, Valentin Wimmer, … Fred A. van Eeuwijk·BMC Genomic DataPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2021
- Inferring the Allelic Series at QTL in Multiparental Populations
Wesley L. Crouse, Samir N. P. Kelada, William S. J. Valdar·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 20, 2020
- A diallel of the mouse Collaborative Cross founders reveals strong strain-specific maternal effects on litter size
John R. Shorter, Paul L. Maurizio, … Fernando Pardo‐Manuel de Villena·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2019