"Tumor Treating Fields" delivered via electromagnetic induction have varied effects across glioma cell lines and electric field amplitudes
R. Ravin, T. X. Cai, A. Li, N. Briceno, R. H. Pursley, M.-G. Cedillos, T. Pohida, H. Wang, Z. Zhuang, J. Cui, N. Y. Morgan, N. H. Williamson, M. R. Gilbert, P. J. Basser
Abstract
Previous studies reported that alternating electric fields (EFs) in the intermediate frequency (100 - 300 kHz) and low intensity (1 - 3 V/cm) regime -- termed "Tumor Treating Fields" (TTFields) -- have a specific, anti-proliferative effect on glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cells. However, the mechanism(s) of action remain(s) incompletely understood, hindering the clinical adoption of treatments based on TTFields. To advance the study of such treatment in vitro, we developed an inductive device to deliver EFs to cell cultures which improves thermal and osmolar regulation compared to prior devices. Using this inductive device, we applied continuous, 200 kHz electromagnetic fields (EMFs) with a radial EF amplitude profile spanning 0 - 6.5 V/cm to cultures of primary rat astrocytes and several human GBM cell lines -- U87, U118, GSC827, and GSC923 -- for a duration of 72 hours. Cell density was assessed via segmented pixel densities from GFP expression (U87, U118) or from staining (astrocytes, GSC827, GSC923). Further RNA-Seq analyses were performed on GSC827 and GSC923 cells. Treated cultures of all cell lines exhibited little to no change in proliferation at lower EF amplitudes (0 - 3 V/cm). At higher amplitudes (> 4 V/cm), different effects were observed. Apparent cell densities increased (U87), decreased (GSC827, GSC923), or showed little change (U118, astrocytes). RNA-Seq analyses on treated and untreated GSC827 and GSC923 cells revealed differentially expressed gene sets of interest, such as those related to cell cycle control. Up- and down-regulation, however, was not consistent across cell lines nor EF amplitudes. Our results indicate no consistent, anti-proliferative effect of 200 kHz EMFs across GBM cell lines and thus contradict previous in vitro findings. Rather, effects varied across different cell lines and EF amplitude regimes, highlighting the need to assess the effect(s) of TTFields and similar treatments on a per cell line basis.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Electric Field Responsive Nanotransducers for Glioblastoma
A. Jain, I. Jobson, … F. J. Rawson·Bioelectronic MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 19, 2022
- Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Tumor Treating Fields System for Glioblastoma Therapy: From Prototype Design to Preclinical Evaluation
Xindong Wang, Han Lv, … Xian Wang·Tumor DiscoveryPeer-reviewed·Mar 3, 2025
- Electromagnetic Field and Temozolomide Increase Differentiation of Human Glioblastoma Cell Line; concise view of mechanism
Meysam Ahmadi-Zeidabadi, Zeinab Akbarnejad, … Hossein Eskandary·bioRxiv·Jun 6, 2018
- Tumor Treating Fields Suppression of Ciliogenesis Enhances Temozolomide Toxicity
P. Shi, J. Tian, … M. R. Sarkisian·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2021
- Aurora Kinase A Inhibition plus Tumor Treating Fields Suppress Glioma Cell Proliferation in a Cilium-Independent Manner
J. Tian, J. Mallinger, … M. Sarkisian·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2023
- Application of a simple device for "attracting" and "trapping" glioma cells in situ
Haimin Song, Runwei Yang, … Yawei Liu·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2021