Cell Painting and chemical structure read-across can complement each other for rat acute oral toxicity prediction in chemical early de-risking
Fabrice Camilleri, Joanna M. WendaiD, Claire Pecoraro-Mercier, Jean‐Paul CometiD, David RouquiéiD
Abstract
Early de-risking decisions in the development of new chemical compounds, enable the identification of novel chemical candidates with improved safety profiles. In vivo studies are traditionally conducted in the early assessment of acute oral toxicity of crop protection products to avoid compounds which are considered "very acutely toxic", with an in vivo Lethal Dose of 50% (LD50) [≤] 60 mg/kg bodyweight. Those studies are lengthy, costly, and raise ethical concerns, catalyzing the use of non-animal alternatives. The objective of our analysis was to assess the predictive efficacy of read-across approaches for acute oral toxicity in rats, comparing the use of chemical structure information, in vitro biological data derived from the Cell Painting profiling assay on U2OS cells or the combination of both. Our findings indicate that the classification of compounds as very acute oral toxic (LD50 [≤] 60 mg/kg) or not is possible using a read-across approach, with chemical structure information, morphological profiles, or a combination of both. When classifying compounds structurally similar to those in the training set, chemical structure was more predictive (balanced accuracy of 0.82). Conversely, when the compounds to be classified were structurally different from those in the training set, the morphological profiles were more predictive (balanced accuracy of 0.72). Combining the two models allowed for the classification of compounds structurally similar to those in the training set, to slightly improve the predictions (balanced accuracy of 0.85). O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=102 SRC="FIGDIR/small/591123v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d7d4fcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e00a92org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d60fccorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a72961_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG For Table of Contents Only C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Field percentile
- top 17%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Toxicity Prediction Tools Do Not Generalize to Novel Chemistry
Martin Weiss, Circe Hsu, … Antonio H. O. Fonseca·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2026
- Predicting Toxicity and Bioactivity of the Chemical Exposome: A Case Study for the Blood Exposome Database
Ankita Dutta, Dinesh Kumar Barupal·Journal of CheminformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2026
- Cross-chemical and cross-species toxicity prediction: benchmarkingand a novel 3D-structure-based deep learning model
Ruoying Yuan, Joseph R. Shaw, … Yuzhen Ye·Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2026
- Integrating Cell Morphology with Gene Expression and Chemical Structure to Aid Mitochondrial Toxicity Detection
Srijit Seal, Jordi Carreras Puigvert, … Andreas Bender·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 23, 2022
- Transformers enable accurate prediction of acute and chronic chemical toxicity in aquatic organisms
M. Gustavsson, S. Kall, … E. Kristiansson·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2023
- Mechanistically Interpretable Toxicity Prediction Through Multimodal Integration of Structure and Transcriptomics
Guillaume Cattebeke, Anne-Sofie Vermeersch, … Filip Van Nieuwerburgh·bioRxiv·Nov 14, 2025