Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Multimodal Hippocampal Subfield Grading For Alzheimer’s Disease Classification
Kilian HettiD, Vinh‐Thong TaiD, Gwénaëlle CathelineiD, Thomas TourdiasiD, José V. ManjóniD, Pierrick Coupé AiD, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Michael Walter WeineriD, Paul S. S AiseniD, Ronald Carl PeterseniD, Clifford R. JackiD, William J. JagustiD, John Q. Trojanowki, Arthur W. TogaiD, Laurel A. BeckettiD, Robert C. GreeniD, Andrew J. SaykiniD, John C. MorrisiD, Leslie M. J. ShawiD, Zaven S. Khachaturian, Greg Sorensen, Marı́a C. Carrillo, Lew Kuller, Marc Raichle, Steven M. PauliD, , Randall Griffith
Abstract
Numerous studies have proposed biomarkers based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect and predict the risk of evolution toward Alzheimers disease (AD). While anatomical MRI captures structural alterations, studies demonstrated the ability of diffusion MRI to capture microstructural modifications at an earlier stage. Several methods have focused on hippocampus structure to detect AD. To date, the patch-based grading framework provides the best biomarker based on the hippocampus. However, this structure is complex since the hippocampus is divided into several heterogeneous subfields not equally impacted by AD. Former in-vivo imaging studies only investigated structural alterations of these subfields using volumetric measurements and microstructural modifications with mean diffusivity measurements. The aim of our work is to study the efficiency of hippocampal subfields compared to the whole hippocampus structure with a multimodal patch-based framework that enables to capture subtler structural and microstructural alterations. To this end, we analyze the significance of the different hippocampal subfields for AD diagnosis and prognosis with volumetric, diffusivity measurements and a novel multimodal patch-based grading framework that combines structural and diffusion MRI. The experiments conducted in this work showed that the whole hippocampus provides the most discriminant biomarkers for advanced AD detection while biomarkers applied into subiculum obtain the best results for AD prediction, improving by 2% the accuracy compared to the whole hippocampus.
- Citations
- 49
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A Large-scale Comparison of Cortical and Subcortical Structural Segmentation Methods in Alzheimer's Disease: a Statistical Approach
Jafar Zamani, Ali Sadr, Amir‐Homayoun Javadi·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2020
- Separable multidimensional MRI signatures of cellular and structural pathology in Alzheimer's disease
Eppu Manninen, Courtney J. Comrie, … Dan Benjamini·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2026
- Hippocampal grey matter changes across scales in Alzheimer's Disease
Bradley G. Karat, Mahdieh Varvani Farahani, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2025
- Diagnosis and Prognosis of Alzheimer’s Disease Using Brain Morphometry and White Matter Connectomes
Yun Wang, Chenxiao Xu, … The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·NeuroImage ClinicalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- Association of object mnemonic discrimination deficit with age and AD biomarkers in older adults
Zhengshi Yang, Xiaowei Zhuang, … Dietmar Cordes·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2026
- Deep Learning on MRI Affirms the Prominence of the Hippocampal Formation in Alzheimer’s Disease Classification
Xinyang Feng, Jie Yang, … Frank A. Provenzano·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2018