\"Bolder\" together - response to human social cues in free-ranging dogs

Interspecific interactions within an ecosystem have different direct and indirect effects on the two interacting species. In the urban environment, humans are a part of an interaction network of several species. While indirect human influence on different urban species has been measured extensively, experimental studies concerning direct human influence are lacking. In this study, we tested interactions between groups of urban free-ranging dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) and solitary unfamiliar humans in ecologically relevant contexts. We provided different sets of dogs with four commonly used human social cues (neutral, friendly, low and high impact threatening) to understand their responses at the group-level and identify potential inter-individual differences. Finally, we compared data from a previous study to investigate the differences in behavioural outcomes between solitary and groups of dogs while interacting with humans. The study not only strengthens the idea of situation-relevant responsiveness in free-ranging dogs but also highlights the minute differences between solitary and group-level reactions in the form of higher approach and less anxious behaviour of groups towards the unfamiliar human. Additionally, we report inter-individual differences and the effect of sex while responding to the threatening cues. Our study suggests a direct benefit of group-living over a solitary lifestyle in free-ranging dogs while interacting with humans in the streets.\n\nSummary statementFree-ranging dogs can benefit by living in groups over a solitary lifestyle while interacting with unfamiliar humans in urban habitats irrespective of having significant inter-individual differences.