ACS SensorsBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article
Solid-State Nanopore Sizing for cfDNA Sample Quality Control in Point-of-Need Sequencing
Muhammad Asad Ullah KhalidiD, Md. Ahasan AhamediD, Anthony J. PolitzaiD, Weihua GuaniD
Abstract
DNA sequencing is a powerful tool for diagnosing conditions like infectious diseases and cancers. Even though current workflows demand rigorous quality control (QC) of DNA samples, this QC is typically limited to lab settings, despite recent advances in portable nanopore sequencers. For personalized healthcare to truly benefit from the portable sequencer, QC must be performed right where the samples are processed. Here, we present a solid-state nanopore device that provides label-free, controlled quantification and qualification of cell-free DNA (cfDNA). We demonstrated the use of a 1 kbp double-stranded DNA internal marker at a known concentration to measure the concentration of a representative cfDNA target in the presence of genomic DNA. We also found that nanopores with diameters ranging from 6 to 19 nm yield consistent measurements, with a maximum coefficient of variation (CV) of less than 15%. Moreover, analyzing data from multiple nanopores over longer acquisition times can reduce the uncertainty to below 10% CV. Finally, we applied our nanopore QC assay to a plasma cfDNA sample and compared the results with those from a capillary electrophoresis (CE) assay. Both methods produced highly correlated measurements, demonstrating the potential of our nanopore QC assay for effective cfDNA assessment at the point of need. Table of Contents Figure O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=108 SRC="FIGDIR/small/643726v1_ufigl1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (21K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1131713org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4ffeb1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1da48e3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e7697a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Field percentile
- top 29%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Performance Test of the QNome Nanopore Sequencer
Ken A. Thompson, Sean W. J. Prosser, … Paul D. N. Hebert·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2026
- High-Fidelity Nanopore Sequencing of Ultra-Short DNA Sequences
B. D. Wilson, M. Eisenstein, H. T. Soh·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2019
- Single molecule methylation profiles of cell-free DNA in cancer with nanopore sequencing
Billy T. Lau, Alison Figueroa Almeda, … Hanlee P. Ji·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 3, 2023
- Evaluation of pre-analytical factors affecting plasma DNA analysis
Havell Markus, Tania Contente‐Cuomo, … Muhammed Murtaza·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2018
- Nanopore Fingerprinting of Supramolecular DNA Nanostructures
S. Confederat, I. Sandei, … P. Actis·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2022
- Nanopore-based DNA sequencing in clinical microbiology: preliminary assessment of basic requirements
Håvard Harstad, Rafi Ahmad, Anders Bredberg·bioRxiv·Aug 1, 2018