Sign in
GenomicsGenome Research
Peer-reviewed journal article

Large palindromes on the primate X Chromosome are preserved by natural selection

Emily K. JacksoniD, Daniel W. BellottiD, Ting-Jan Cho, Helen SkaletskyiD, Jennifer F. HughesiD, Tatyana Pyntikova, David C. PageiD

Abstract

Mammalian sex chromosomes carry large palindromes that harbor protein-coding gene families with testis-biased expression. However, there are few known examples of sex-chromosome palindromes conserved between species. We identified 26 palindromes on the human X Chromosome, constituting more than 2% of its sequence, and characterized orthologous palindromes in the chimpanzee and the rhesus macaque using a clone-based sequencing approach that incorporates full-length nanopore reads. Many of these palindromes are missing or misassembled in the current reference assemblies of these species genomes. We find that 12 human X palindromes have been conserved for at least 25 million years, with orthologs in both chimpanzee and rhesus macaque. Insertions and deletions between species are significantly depleted within the X palindromes protein-coding genes compared to their non-coding sequence, demonstrating that natural selection has preserved these gene families. Unexpectedly, the spacers that separate the left and right arms of palindromes are a site of localized structural instability, with 7 of 12 conserved palindromes showing no spacer orthology between human and rhesus macaque. Analysis of the 1000 Genomes Project dataset revealed that human X-palindrome spacers are enriched for deletions relative to arms and flanking sequence, including a common spacer deletion that affects 13% of human X Chromosomes. This work reveals an abundance of conserved palindromes on primate X Chromosomes, and suggests that protein-coding gene families in palindromes (most of which remain poorly characterized) promote X-palindrome survival in the face of ongoing structural instability.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISJackson '21Swanepoel '20Kruger '18Stark-Dykem '22Zhou '20Pal '24
73% semantic matchGenomics
Emily K. Jackson, Daniel W. Bellott, Helen Skaletsky+1 more·G3 Genes Genomes Genetics·Jul 8, 2021· 5 citations