Sign in
ImmunologybioRxiv
Preprint

Exploratory positional differences in observed CDRH2 lineage-state transitions following HIV-1 germline-targeting vaccination

Kazi Tanzina Begum, K. A. G. Rafea

Abstract

Background: Germline-targeting HIV-1 vaccination recruits VRC01-class B-cell precursors, but the positional patterns of observed longitudinal B-cell receptor lineage-state changes remain incompletely described. We compared CDRH2 profiles between homologous and heterologous boosting regimens using published IAVI G002 data. Methods: Participant-specific Week-8 lineages were prospectively matched to Week-24 observations. Germline-to-nongermline changes in sampled lineage-modal residues were evaluated at seven IGHV1-2*02 CDRH2 positions using participant-balanced, mean-centered profiles and exact participant-label permutation inference. Sampling-depth and sorting-probe sensitivity analyses assessed observability. A separate participant-held-out benchmark evaluated antibody-language-model representations for predicting observed Week-24 lineage detection. Results: The CDRH2 analysis included 332 lineages, 15 participants, 2,179 eligible lineage-position observations, and 241 observed state changes. The regional profile statistic was 0.027066 (exact p = 0.001709; six-region adjusted q = 0.010256), with descriptive differences at V-relative positions 51, 54, and 55. Most eligible longitudinal observations had one assessable cell per visit. In seven Group-1 participants, Week-24 dual-probe sampling recovered 181 baseline lineages with eOD-GT8 and 143 with Cg28v2, including 60 detected by both probes. In a separate cohort of 2,739 lineages from 17 participants, IgBERT and AbLang-2 representations did not improve participant-balanced average precision over a four-feature biological baseline. Conclusions: Observed CDRH2 lineage-modal-state profiles differed between regimens in this exploratory secondary analysis. Sparse sampling, potentially probe-related ascertainment, and absent linked functional validation preclude inference about mutation timing, functional improvement, or causal booster effects.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.