Frontiers in BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Synth4bench: Synthetic Data Generation for Benchmarking Tumor-Only Somatic Variant Calling Algorithms
Styliani-Christina FragkouliiD, Nikos PechlivanisiD, Anastasia Anastasiadou, Georgios KarakatsoulisiD, Aspasia OrfanouiD, Panagoula Kolia, Andreas AgathangelidisiD, F. PsomopoulosiD
Abstract
MotivationSomatic variant calling is a key activity towards identifying genomic alterations; yet, the evaluation of the respective tools remains challenging due to the scarcity of high quality ground truth datasets. To overcome this limitation, we developed synth4bench, a synthetic data generation pipeline for robust benchmarking. Using a systematic process to create distinct synthetic datasets, we thoroughly evaluated five variant callers (Mutect2, FreeBayes, VarDict, VarScan2 and LoFreq). We compared tool outputs against our synthetic ground truth across key sequencing aspects (such as depth and read length) to assess their capacities and shed light on their underlying algorithmic principles. ResultsSynth4bench is an approach for evaluating tumor-only somatic variant callers that relies on a systematic definition of fully controlled ground-truth datasets. Our analysis revealed significant inconsistencies among the tool outputs and a strong dependence of caller performance on sequencing parameters. Indels remain the hardest-to-call variant type, driven by errors at low allele frequencies. Algorithmic choice is also critical; the most robust callers displayed the highest precision in allele frequency estimation, while the most sensitive caller was best for maximizing true positive recovery. Conversely, the least suitable caller exhibited systematic errors along with the poorest overall performance. These findings indicate that there isnt a one-solution-fit-all; sequencing optimization together with caller selection are necessary to maximize sensitivity and reliability. Furthermore, the pronounced inconsistencies suggest that current algorithms are not yet able to capture all mutational mechanisms adequately, with the modeling of the underlying processes remaining an open challenge. Availabilitycode: https://github.com/sfragkoul/synth4bench/ and data: https://zenodo.org/records/16524193 Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=69 SRC="FIGDIR/small/582313v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (16K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ac0fe5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1479cddorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8b7d1borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c2a81b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 49th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Combining accurate tumour genome simulation with crowd-sourcing to benchmark somatic structural variant detection
Anna Y. Lee, Adam D. Ewing, … Paul Christopher Boutros·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 6, 2018
- Evaluation of somatic variant calling methods on high coverage tumour-only amplicon sequencing data in a clinical environment
Dhammapal Bharne, Daniel Gaston·bioRxiv·Apr 11, 2026
- New synthetic-diploid benchmark for accurate variant calling evaluation
Heng Li, Jonathan M. Bloom, … Daniel G. MacArthur·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2018
- UMI-Gen: a UMI-based reads simulator for variant calling evaluation in paired-end sequencing NGS libraries
Vincent Sater, Pierre‐Julien Viailly, … Fabrice Jardin·Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- RabbitVar: ultra-fast and accurate somatic small-variant calling on multi-core architectures
Hao Zhang, Lin Gan, … Weiguo Liu·Future Generation Computer SystemsPeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2026
- Genomic variant calling: Flexible tools and a diagnostic data set
Michael Lawrence, Melanie A. Huntley, … Robert Gentleman·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2015