Genome biologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Combining accurate tumour genome simulation with crowd-sourcing to benchmark somatic structural variant detection
Anna Y. Lee, Adam D. EwingiD, Kyle EllrottiD, Yin HuiD, Kathleen E. HoulahaniD, J Christopher BareiD, Shadrielle M. G. EspirituiD, Vincent HuangiD, Kristen Dang, Zechen ChongiD, Cristian Caloian, Takafumi N. YamaguchiiD, ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling Challenge Participants, Michael KelleniD, Ken CheniD, Thea NormaniD, Stephen Henry FriendiD, Justin GuinneyiD, Gustavo A. StolovitzkyiD, David H. HaussleriD, Adam A. Margolin, Joshua M. StuartiD, Paul Christopher BoutrosiD
Abstract
BackgroundThe phenotypes of cancer cells are driven in part by somatic structural variants. Structural variants can initiate tumors, enhance their aggressiveness and provide unique therapeutic opportunities. Whole-genome sequencing of tumors can allow exhaustive identification of the specific structural variants present in an individual cancer, facilitating both clinical diagnostics and the discovery of novel mutagenic mechanisms. A plethora of somatic structural variant detection algorithms have been created to enable these discoveries, however there are no systematic benchmarks of them. Rigorous performance evaluation of somatic structural variant detection methods has been challenged by the lack of gold-standards, extensive resource requirements and difficulties arising from the need to share personal genomic information.\n\nResultsTo facilitate structural variant detection algorithm evaluations, we create a robust simulation framework for somatic structural variants by extending the BAMSurgeon algorithm. We then organize and enable a crowd-sourced benchmarking within the ICGC-TCGA DREAM Somatic Mutation Calling Challenge (SMC-DNA). We report here the results of structural variant benchmarking on three different tumors, comprising 204 submissions from 15 teams. In addition to ranking methods, we identify characteristic error-profiles of individual algorithms and general trends across them. Surprisingly, we find that ensembles of analysis pipelines do not always outperform the best individual method, indicating a need for new ways to aggregate somatic structural variant detection approaches.\n\nConclusionsThe synthetic tumors and somatic structural variant detection leaderboards remain available as a community benchmarking resource, and BAMSurgeon is available at https://github.com/adamewing/bamsurgeon.
- Citations
- 50
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- An optimised computational approach for the identification of somatic structural variants in cancer
Sara Waise, Nana Mensah, … Peter Van Loo·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2025
- The benefit of a complete reference genome for cancer structural variant analysis
Luis F. Paulin, Jeremy Fan, … Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck·medRxiv·Mar 15, 2024
- A multi-platform reference for somatic structural variation detection
Jose Espejo Valle-Inclán, Nicolle J.M. Besselink, … Edwin P. J. G. Cuppen·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022
- Synth4bench: Synthetic Data Generation for Benchmarking Tumor-Only Somatic Variant Calling Algorithms
Styliani-Christina Fragkouli, Nikos Pechlivanis, … F. Psomopoulos·Frontiers in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 16, 2026
- Anyone can be the best: Impact of diverse methodologies on the evaluation of structural variant callers
Luca Denti, Thomas Krannich, … Fereydoun Hormozdiari·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2025
- Somatic Structural Variant Discovery from Tumor Specific Strings Computed Against a Draft Composite Germline Reference
Davide Cesare Monti, Simone Ciccolella, … Fereydoun Hormozdiari·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2026